Equitable indemnity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not a thing. | Not a thing. ''Except in California''<ref>[http://vondranlegal.com/what-is-definition-of-equitable-idemnity/ Client briefing on the fabulous Californian legal concept of the [[equitable indemnity]]]</ref>. | ||
''Except in California''<ref>[http://vondranlegal.com/what-is-definition-of-equitable-idemnity/ Client briefing on the fabulous Californian legal concept of the [[equitable indemnity]]</ref>. | |||
Which reminds me: | Which reminds me: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 6: | ||
{{hawf}} | {{hawf}} | ||
Anyway, since it isn’t a thing, its non-existence can be definitively established by deft use of a suitable [[disclaimer]]. | |||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:24, 14 January 2020
Not a thing. Except in California[1].
Which reminds me:
- Q: How many Californians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
- A: None. Californians screw in spa-pools.
This gag comes to you direct from our “here all week, folks!” store of corking one-liners.
Anyway, since it isn’t a thing, its non-existence can be definitively established by deft use of a suitable disclaimer.