Template:Isda 9(g) summ: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "So suddenly, in Section {{{{{1}}}|9(g)}} of all places<ref>What am I to make of the headings before Section 9 that, being a logical fellow, I have already read?</ref>, the mem...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
So suddenly, in Section {{{{{1}}}|9(g)}} of all places<ref>What am I to make of the headings before Section 9 that, being a logical fellow, I have already read?</ref>, the members of {{icds}} wake up out of their collective fever dream, and this is what they say: It’s like, “okay, so we wrote them; we did put them here — hands up, we admit it — ''but we don’t mean anything by them''”.  
So suddenly, in Section {{{{{1}}}|9(g)}} of all places<ref>What am I to make of the headings before Section 9 that, being a logical fellow, I have already read?</ref>, the members of {{icds}} wake up out of their collective fever dream, and this is what they say: It’s like, “okay, so we wrote them; we did put them here — hands up, we admit it — ''but we don’t mean anything by them''”.  


Don’t you just love [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyers]]?
Don’t you just ''love'' [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyers]]?

Revision as of 16:56, 15 April 2020

So suddenly, in Section {{{{{1}}}|9(g)}} of all places[1], the members of ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ wake up out of their collective fever dream, and this is what they say: It’s like, “okay, so we wrote them; we did put them here — hands up, we admit it — but we don’t mean anything by them”.

Don’t you just love lawyers?

  1. What am I to make of the headings before Section 9 that, being a logical fellow, I have already read?