Template:Affiliate capsule: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "The idea of an “affiliate” is really not a complicated one in the abstract but yet in the world of contracting commercial undertakings it is one which our learned frie..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An “[[affiliate]]” is really not a complicated idea in the abstract, yet in the world of commercial [[contract|contracts]], [[Legal Eagle|our learned friends]] rejoice in overdetermining it all the same. For these men and women, a “[[affiliate]]” of an undertaking could be: | |||
For | |||
*'''Parent''': its parent or holding company, which holds all or a majority of its ordinary share capital — often abbreviated as a “holdco” | *'''Parent''': its parent or holding company, which holds all or a majority of its ordinary share capital — often abbreviated as a “holdco” | ||
*'''Child''': its subsidiary — a company the ordinary share capital of which it holds all or a majority | *'''Child''': its subsidiary — a company the ordinary share capital of which it holds all or a majority | ||
*'''Sibling''': a company in common ownership with the corporate being; that is to say, a company that shares the same parent or holding company. | *'''Sibling''': a company in common ownership with the corporate being; that is to say, a company that shares the same parent or holding company. | ||
And that is about it. Pedants will be anxious to point out that, [[share]]s being the divisible ownership units that they are, and different degrees of control and voting rights attaching to different ''classes'' of share, there are ''degrees'' of ownership, and affiliation, and some imply more connectedness than others. Any confusion is usually resolved by pointing at the definition of “subsidiary” and “holding company” in the [[Companies Act 2006 (UK)|Companies Act]], or similar legislation in a jurisdiction near you. The {{isdama}} does a reasonably neat job of capturing the above by reference to the majority of voting control. | |||
Latest revision as of 22:42, 12 December 2020
An “affiliate” is really not a complicated idea in the abstract, yet in the world of commercial contracts, our learned friends rejoice in overdetermining it all the same. For these men and women, a “affiliate” of an undertaking could be:
- Parent: its parent or holding company, which holds all or a majority of its ordinary share capital — often abbreviated as a “holdco”
- Child: its subsidiary — a company the ordinary share capital of which it holds all or a majority
- Sibling: a company in common ownership with the corporate being; that is to say, a company that shares the same parent or holding company.
And that is about it. Pedants will be anxious to point out that, shares being the divisible ownership units that they are, and different degrees of control and voting rights attaching to different classes of share, there are degrees of ownership, and affiliation, and some imply more connectedness than others. Any confusion is usually resolved by pointing at the definition of “subsidiary” and “holding company” in the Companies Act, or similar legislation in a jurisdiction near you. The ISDA Master Agreement does a reasonably neat job of capturing the above by reference to the majority of voting control.