Right, title and interest: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{a|plainenglish|}}Right, title and interest is habitual legal triplicate to capture an enforceable claim with respect to something, however it may ma...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 14:10, 28 December 2020

Towards more picturesque speech


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Right, title and interest is habitual legal triplicate to capture an enforceable claim with respect to something, however it may manifest itself. Of the three “title” — formal legal ownership of something capable of being owned — is the narrowest and, we think, “interest” is the widest — encompassing equitable and legal claims, expectations and aspirations that might through the machinery of some judicial process benefit the claimant — and any prose stylist would therefore declaim “right” (one person’s enforceable claim against another person or thing, whether amounting to a title or not) and “title” for “interest”.