ISDA netting categories: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|netting|}}When it comes to analysing netting opinions for {{isdama}}, one helpful thing ISDA came up with is to create generic categories of legal entity which local counsel could match the specific legal entities in that jurisdiction. So for example, an english [[limited liability company]], a Luxembourg [[société anonyme]] and a German [[aktiengesellschaft]] are each varieties of thegeneric ISDA category “[[Corporation]]”. This means that a netting engine needs to have only fifteen legal entity types, rather than thousands.
===In short===
*[[Bank/Credit Institution]]
*[[Central Bank]]
*[[Corporation]]
*[[Hedge Fund/Proprietary Trader]]
*[[Insurance Company]]
*[[International Organization]]
*[[Investment Firm/Broker-Dealer]]
*[[Investment Fund]]
*[[Local Authority]]
*[[Partnership]]
*[[Pension Fund]]
*[[Sovereign]]
*[[Sovereign Wealth Fund]]
*[[Sovereign-Owned Entity]]
*[[State of a Federal Sovereign]]
===In detail===
*{{bankcreditinstitution}}  
*{{bankcreditinstitution}}  
*{{centralbank}}
*{{centralbank}}
Line 6: Line 24:
*{{internationalorganization}}
*{{internationalorganization}}
*{{investmentfirmbrokerdealer}}
*{{investmentfirmbrokerdealer}}
*{{investmentfund}} '''[[Investment Fund]]'''. A legal entity or an arrangement without legal personality (for example, a common law trust) established to provide investors with a share in profits or income arising from property acquired, held, managed or disposed of by the manager(s) of the legal entity or arrangement or a right to payment determined by reference to such profits or income. This type of entity or arrangement is referred to as a “collective investment scheme” in EC legislation. It may be regulated or unregulated. It is typically administered by one or more persons (who may be private individuals and/or corporate entities) who have various rights and obligations governed by general law and/or, typically in the case of regulated Investment Funds, financial services legislation. Where the arrangement does not have separate legal personality, one or more representatives of the Investment Fund (for example, a trustee of a unit trust) contract on behalf of the Investment Fund, are owed the rights and owe the obligations provided for in the contract and are entitled to be indemnified out of the assets comprised in the arrangement. <br>
*{{investmentfund}}
 
*{{localauthority}}
*{{localauthority}}'''[[Local Authority]].  A legal entity established to administer the functions of local government in a particular region within a Sovereign or State of a Federal Sovereign, for example, a city, county, borough or similar area.
 
*{{partnership}}
*{{partnership}}
*{{pensionfund}}'''[[Pension Fund]]''': A legal entity or an arrangement without legal personality (for example, a common law trust) established to provide pension benefits to a specific class of beneficiaries, normally sponsored by an employer or group of employers. It is typically administered by one or more persons (who may be private individuals and/or corporate entities) who have various rights and obligations governed by pensions legislation. Where the arrangement does not have separate legal personality, one or more representatives of the Pension Fund (for example, a trustee of a pension scheme in the form of a common law trust) contract on behalf of the Pension Fund and are owed the rights and owe the obligations provided for in the contract and are entitled to be indemnified out of the assets comprised in the arrangement.<br>
*{{pensionfund}}
 
*{{sovereign}}
*{{sovereign}}'''[[Sovereign]]''': A sovereign nation state recognized No internationally as such, typically acting through a direct agency or instrumentality of the central government without separate legal personality, for example, the ministry of finance, treasury or national debt office. This category does not include a State of a Federal Sovereign or other political sub-division of a sovereign nation state if the sub-division has separate legal personality (for example, a Local Authority) and it does not include any legal entity owned by a sovereign nation state (see “Sovereign-owned Entity").<br>
*{{sovereignwealthfund}}
 
*{{sovereignownedentity}}
*{{sovereignwealthfund}}'''[[Sovereign Wealth Fund]]''': A legal entity, often created by a special statute and normally wholly owned by a Sovereign, established to manage assets of or on behalf of the Sovereign, which may or may not hold those assets in its own name. Such an entity is often referred to as an “investment authority”. For certain Sovereigns, this function is performed by the Central Bank, however for purposes of this Appendix B the term “Sovereign Wealth Fund” excludes a Central Bank. <br>
*{{stateofafederalsovereign}}
 
*{{sovereignownedentity}}'''[[Sovereign-Owned Entity]]''':  A legal entity wholly or No majority-owned by a Sovereign, other than a Central Bank, or by a State of a Federal Sovereign, which may or may not benefit from any immunity enjoyed by the Sovereign or State of a Federal Sovereign from legal proceedings or execution against its assets. This category may include entities active entirely in the private sector without any specific public duties or public sector mission as well as statutory bodies with public duties (for example, a statutory body charged with regulatory responsibility over a sector of the domestic economy). This category does not include local governmental authorities (see “Local Authority"). <br>
 
*{{stateofafederalsovereign}}'''[[State of a Federal Sovereign]]''': The principal political sub-division of a federal Sovereign, such as Australia (for example, Queensland), Canada (for example, Ontario), Gennany (for example, Nordrhein-Westfalen) or the United States of America (for example, Pennsylvania). This category does not include a Local Authority. <br>


{{nettingcategories}}
{{sa}}
*[[ISDA netting categories]]
*[[Close-out netting]]
{{c|Netting Categories}}

Latest revision as of 15:47, 21 September 2021

Netting resources
Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

When it comes to analysing netting opinions for ISDA Master Agreement, one helpful thing ISDA came up with is to create generic categories of legal entity which local counsel could match the specific legal entities in that jurisdiction. So for example, an english limited liability company, a Luxembourg société anonyme and a German aktiengesellschaft are each varieties of thegeneric ISDA category “Corporation”. This means that a netting engine needs to have only fifteen legal entity types, rather than thousands.

In short

In detail

See also