Ejusdem generis: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|plainenglish|}}
{{a|latin|}}{{ejusdem generic capsule}}
{{ejusdem generic capsule}}
{{without limitation and ejusdem generis}}


{{interpretation sa}}
{{interpretation sa}}
*[[without limitation]]
*[[without limitation]]
*The [[JC]]’s parable of [[the farmer and the sheep]]
*The [[JC]]’s parable of [[the farmer and the sheep]]

Latest revision as of 15:25, 10 January 2022

The JC’s guide to pithy Latin adages
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

The ejusdem generis rule of statutory interpretation — which we contract hacks like when it suits us to extend by analogy into contractual interpretation — says wherever general words follow specific words, the general words should be read to include only objects similar in nature to those specific words.

So, “any uprising, riot, looting, organised disobedience or other civil commotion” would not include “ironic flash-mob performances of songs from The Sound of Music, however tiresome or poorly organised”, as long as not specifically violent in aspect (of course, there is every chance that passers-by would become spontaneously violent upon being confronted by an ironic flash mob).

See also