Template:M summ Pledge GMSLA 11.4: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{M summ GMSLA 11.4}}" |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | [[11.4 - Pledge GMSLA Provision|How]] you value a [[mini close-out]] where a party can’t redeliver a stock (because it’s been suspended or something). It boils down to how you value either leg of the trade. | ||
If the {{pgmslaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}} has actually sold securities {{pgmslaprov|equivalent}} to those it lent, in can treat the price it got as the {{pgmslaprov|Default Market Value}}. If it hasn’t, it must get two or more reference [[market maker]] [[quotation]]s and average those. | |||
Tricks to watch out for, especially in illiquid stocks, is that the {{pgmslaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}} is not somehow influencing the price at which that innocent third party might transact (by agreeing to enter an offsetting transaction at the same time). That would be fraudulent, of course. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:05, 31 March 2022
How you value a mini close-out where a party can’t redeliver a stock (because it’s been suspended or something). It boils down to how you value either leg of the trade.
If the Non-Defaulting Party has actually sold securities equivalent to those it lent, in can treat the price it got as the Default Market Value. If it hasn’t, it must get two or more reference market maker quotations and average those.
Tricks to watch out for, especially in illiquid stocks, is that the Non-Defaulting Party is not somehow influencing the price at which that innocent third party might transact (by agreeing to enter an offsetting transaction at the same time). That would be fraudulent, of course.