Template:M summ Pledge GMSLA 11.4: Difference between revisions

Template:M summ Pledge GMSLA 11.4 (view source)

240 bytes added , 31 March 2022

no edit summary

83,057

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[11.4 - GMSLA Provision|How]] you value a [[mini close-out]] where a party can’t redeliver a stock (because it’s been suspended or something). It boils down to how you value either leg of the trade.
+[[11.4 - Pledge GMSLA Provision|How]] you value a [[mini close-out]] where a party can’t redeliver a stock (because it’s been suspended or something). It boils down to how you value either leg of the trade.
-If the {{gmslaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}} has actually sold securities {{gmslaprov|equivalent}} to those it lent, in can treat the price it got as the {{gmslaprov|Default Market Value}}. If it hasn’t, it must get two or more reference [[market maker]] [[quotation]]s and average those.
+If the {{pgmslaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}} has actually sold securities {{pgmslaprov|equivalent}} to those it lent, in can treat the price it got as the {{pgmslaprov|Default Market Value}}. If it hasn’t, it must get two or more reference [[market maker]] [[quotation]]s and average those.
-{{Gmsla deliverable and receivable securities capsule|gmslaprov}}
+Tricks to watch out for, especially in illiquid stocks, is that the {{pgmslaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}} is not somehow influencing the price at which that innocent third party might transact (by agreeing to enter an offsetting transaction at the same time). That would be fraudulent, of course.