Template:M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(i)(5): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You will notice similarities between the way a {{euaprov|Suspension Event}} and a {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}}. One can, and we do, bellyache about the way {{icds}} goes about the task of rendering its fantastical ideas in the language of Shakespeare and Milton, but you can’t really fault them for consistency. | [[(d)(i)(5) - Emissions Annex Provision|You]] will notice similarities between the way a {{euaprov|Suspension Event}} and a {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}}. One can, and we do, bellyache about the way {{icds}} goes about the task of rendering its fantastical ideas in the language of Shakespeare and Milton, but you can’t really fault them for consistency. | ||
Here, in counterpoint to a normal {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} if there is delayed performance the payment obligation is adjusted to include a {{euaprov|Cost of Carry Amount}}. | Here, in counterpoint to a normal {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} if there is delayed performance the payment obligation is adjusted to include a {{euaprov|Cost of Carry Amount}}. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:38, 26 July 2022
You will notice similarities between the way a Suspension Event and a Settlement Disruption Event. One can, and we do, bellyache about the way ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ goes about the task of rendering its fantastical ideas in the language of Shakespeare and Milton, but you can’t really fault them for consistency.
Here, in counterpoint to a normal Settlement Disruption Event if there is delayed performance the payment obligation is adjusted to include a Cost of Carry Amount.