Results-driven: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Not to pick on Marc — some bored copyrighter most likely put those words in his mouth, and look: he’s a chocolate guy, not a marketing guy — but we wonder what he, or any of the dreary multitudes driven to apply this sodden phrase in self-description on their [[LinkedIn]] profiles — can possibly mean. How can one be propelled by the expected outcome of one’s propulsion? This is surely to put the cart before the horse.  
Not to pick on Marc — some bored copyrighter most likely put those words in his mouth, and look: he’s a chocolate guy, not a marketing guy — but we wonder what he, or any of the dreary multitudes driven to apply this sodden phrase in self-description on their [[LinkedIn]] profiles — can possibly mean. How can one be propelled by the expected outcome of one’s propulsion? This is surely to put the cart before the horse.  


Motivated by the hope of good ones, perhaps — who isn’t? — but then what results should a chocolatier expect, other than chocolate? “''Awards'' for chocolate” seems to be the rhetorical reply.
Given that ''a'' “result”, of ''some'' kind, is the thermodynamic expectation of every application of force to object however ill-advised, we wonder what people think they are establishing by claiming to be “results-driven”.  


Given that a result, of some kind, is the thermodynamic expectation of every application of force to object, however ill-advised, we wonder what folks think they are establishing when they claim to be “results-driven”. The captain of the Hindenburg got results, after all. So did the deputy chief engineer at Chernobyl. And [[Lehman Brothers|Dick Fuld]]. Just not particularly good ones.
The captain of the [[Hindenburg]] got results, after all. So did the deputy chief engineer at Chernobyl. And [[Lehman Brothers|Dick Fuld]]. Just not particularly ''good'' ones.


So unless your industry is to distinguish yourself from those who work at the firm but have no discernible impact on its operation at all, good or bad — in fairness, that’s most of them — then you might want to put something a little more specific in your bio. And if you can’t — well: ''are'' you having a discernible impact?
So unless your industry is to distinguish yourself from those with whom you work who have ''no'' discernible impact on its operation, good or ill — in fairness, that’s most of them — then you might want to put something a little more specific in your professional autobiography. Or just lie about it. And if you can’t — well: ''are'' you having a discernible impact?


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Revision as of 18:50, 11 August 2022

Crappy advice you find on LinkedIn
Hindenburg.jpg
A results-driven airship pilot yesterday.
An occasional paean to the empty-headed aspirational gems that gush from from LinkedIn’s wellspring of bunk.
Index: Click to expand:LinkedIn: Your best version... | Your value ... | Inspirational you... | A candle in the wind... | Every boss... | Every journey... | We rise... | We lift you up... | You are dynamite... | Your example... | Game-changers and their aspirants

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

The accountants’ favourite chocolatier,[1] Marc de Marquette, tells us:

Marc is driven by results and no better way for him to demonstrate his excellence than winning awards for his creations and his clients.

Not to pick on Marc — some bored copyrighter most likely put those words in his mouth, and look: he’s a chocolate guy, not a marketing guy — but we wonder what he, or any of the dreary multitudes driven to apply this sodden phrase in self-description on their LinkedIn profiles — can possibly mean. How can one be propelled by the expected outcome of one’s propulsion? This is surely to put the cart before the horse.

Given that a “result”, of some kind, is the thermodynamic expectation of every application of force to object however ill-advised, we wonder what people think they are establishing by claiming to be “results-driven”.

The captain of the Hindenburg got results, after all. So did the deputy chief engineer at Chernobyl. And Dick Fuld. Just not particularly good ones.

So unless your industry is to distinguish yourself from those with whom you work who have no discernible impact on its operation, good or ill — in fairness, that’s most of them — then you might want to put something a little more specific in your professional autobiography. Or just lie about it. And if you can’t — well: are you having a discernible impact?

See also

References

  1. And our second favourite chocolatier, after our own in-house chocolatiers, Les Frères Maple, who are special, seeing as we made them up.