Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act of 2010: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Quite how that encourages employers to hire new employees does’t leap off the page at the JC, readers, but it is what it is. | Quite how that encourages employers to hire new employees does’t leap off the page at the JC, readers, but it is what it is. | ||
So ISDA formulated the [[ISDA 2010 Short Form Hire Act Protocol]]. | So ISDA formulated the [[ISDA 2010 Short Form Hire Act Protocol]]. This offers market participants an efficient way to amend their ISDAs to reflect amendments to the U.S. tax law made by the Hire Act. There is also a suggested amendment to your Section {{isdaprov|2(d)}} tax representations. | ||
{{Sa}} | {{Sa}} | ||
*{{isdaprov|Hire Act Amendment}} | *{{isdaprov|Hire Act Amendment}} | ||
*Section [[871(m)]] | *Section [[871(m)]] |
Revision as of 16:14, 22 June 2023
Negotiation Anatomy™
|
The “HIRE Act” was designed to encourage employers to hire and retain new workers. Specifically, the HIRE Act created two new tax benefits that will encourage employers to hire new employees, while offsetting some of the payroll costs associated with new employees.
But that’s not what INSDA ninjas care about. Rather, it is this:
The Act imposes US withholding tax on payments made on any swap made after September 14, 2010 regardless of when the swap was entered into.
Quite how that encourages employers to hire new employees does’t leap off the page at the JC, readers, but it is what it is.
So ISDA formulated the ISDA 2010 Short Form Hire Act Protocol. This offers market participants an efficient way to amend their ISDAs to reflect amendments to the U.S. tax law made by the Hire Act. There is also a suggested amendment to your Section 2(d) tax representations.
See also
- Hire Act Amendment
- Section 871(m)