Template:Underlier: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''“{{eqderivprov|Underlier}}”?''': There isn’t a generic catch-all term for the underlier of an {{eqderiv}} {{eqderivprov|Transaction}}. This is a pity, since “{{eqderivprov|Index}}, {{eqderivprov|Share}} or {{eqderivprov|Basket}} [[as the case may be]]” isn’t the most elegant expression in the annals of legal literature. You might have used “Instrument” or even “{{eqderivprov|Underlier}}” might do. | |||
There isn’t a generic catch-all term for the underlier of an {{eqderiv}} {{eqderivprov|Transaction}}. This is a pity, since “{{eqderivprov|Index}}, {{eqderivprov|Share}} or {{eqderivprov|Basket}} [[as the case may be]]” isn’t the most elegant expression in the annals of legal literature. You might have used “Instrument” or even “{{eqderivprov|Underlier}}” might do. | |||
“{{eqderivprov|Underlier}}” is a [[JC]]-spawned confection, and we do use it [[from time to time]], when our patience with {{icds}} and its leaden drafting becomes as shiny, thin and translucent as the seat of an old pair of suit trousers. | |||
Latest revision as of 02:07, 15 August 2023
“Underlier”?: There isn’t a generic catch-all term for the underlier of an Equity Derivatives Transaction. This is a pity, since “Index, Share or Basket as the case may be” isn’t the most elegant expression in the annals of legal literature. You might have used “Instrument” or even “Underlier” might do.
“Underlier” is a JC-spawned confection, and we do use it from time to time, when our patience with ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ and its leaden drafting becomes as shiny, thin and translucent as the seat of an old pair of suit trousers.