Template:M comp disc EFET Allowance Annex 7.1: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Force Majeure - EFET Allowance Provision|Functionally]], the definition of {{efetaprov|Force Majeure}} is the same in the EFET and IETA versions. Here is a {{diff|77069|77068}}: the differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not.
[[Force Majeure - EFET Allowance Provision|Functionally]], the definitions of {{efetaprov|Force Majeure}} in the EFET and IETA versions, and {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} in the {{euadefs}} are the same.  
 
Here is a {{diff|77069|77068}} between IETA and EFET, and here is a {{diff||}} between EFET and ISDA.
 
The differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not.


The equivalent under the {{emissionsannex}} is the {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} — so called because there is already a Force Majeure under the {{isdama}} so the ’squad had to call their version something else.
The equivalent under the {{emissionsannex}} is the {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} — so called because there is already a Force Majeure under the {{isdama}} so the ’squad had to call their version something else.


Here, for good order, is a {{diff|77096|77095}} between {{efetaprov|Force Majeure}} under the {{efetannex}} and {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} under the {{emissionsannex}}.
Here, for good order, is a {{diff|77096|77095}} between {{efetaprov|Force Majeure}} under the {{efetannex}} and {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} under the {{emissionsannex}}.

Revision as of 14:53, 7 September 2023

Functionally, the definitions of Force Majeure in the EFET and IETA versions, and Settlement Disruption Event in the ISDA Emissions Annex are the same.

Here is a comparison between IETA and EFET, and here is a comparison between EFET and ISDA.

The differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not.

The equivalent under the ISDA EU Emissions Annex is the Settlement Disruption Event — so called because there is already a Force Majeure under the ISDA Master Agreement so the ’squad had to call their version something else.

Here, for good order, is a comparison between Force Majeure under the EFET Allowances Annex and Settlement Disruption Event under the ISDA EU Emissions Annex.

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:M_comp_disc_EFET_Allowance_Annex_7.1&oldid=77952"