Hierarchy: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Removed redirect to Power structure
Tag: Removed redirect
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|Construction|}}The hierarchy clause is the part of the [[interpretation and construction]] [[boilerplate]] that prescribed how the different parts of a modular legal contract interact with each other.  
{{a|construction|}}The hierarchy clause is the part of the [[interpretation and construction]] [[boilerplate]] that prescribed how the different parts of a modular legal contract interact with each other.  


For example, the {{isdama}} comprises the master agreement proper, a {{isdaprov|Schedule}}, a {{isdaprov|Confirmation}}, sometimes a Master Confirmation, and a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Annex}}. In case of conflict, which should govern?
For example, the {{isdama}} comprises the master agreement proper, a {{isdaprov|Schedule}}, a {{isdaprov|Confirmation}}, sometimes a Master Confirmation, and a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Annex}}. In case of conflict, which should govern?

Latest revision as of 10:44, 18 October 2023

Interpretation and construction boilerplate anatomy™
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

The hierarchy clause is the part of the interpretation and construction boilerplate that prescribed how the different parts of a modular legal contract interact with each other.

For example, the ISDA Master Agreement comprises the master agreement proper, a Schedule, a Confirmation, sometimes a Master Confirmation, and a Credit Support Annex. In case of conflict, which should govern?

Usually, it is pretty obvious and ought to go without saying — the later in time prevails; the more specific prevails of the general — but what finance lawyer ever was happy to let anything go without saying?

See also