|
|
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Force Majeure - EFET Allowance Provision|Functionally]], the definition of {{efetaprov|Force Majeure}} is the same in the EFET and IETA versions. Here is a {{diff|77069|77068}}: the differences are to account for the architecture and nomenclature of the different master agreements, though the IETA has a conflict clause favouring Suspension Event over Force Majeure/Settlement Disruption Event, which the EFET does not.
| | {{emissions comparison|{{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}}|{{efetaprov|Force Majeure}}|{{ietaprov|Force Majeure}}}} |
| | | {{emissions force majeure overview|efetaprov}} |
| The equivalent under the {{emissionsannex}} is the {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} — so called because there is already a Force Majeure under the {{isdama}} so the ’squad had to call their version something else.
| |
| | |
| Here, for good order, is a comparison of Force Majeure under the {{efetannex}} and {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} under the {{emissionsannex}}.
| |