Template:Emissions No Encumbrances comp: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The absence of [[encumbrance]]s — which, in the early days of the emissions trading world, where birth pangs still ricocheted and fraudulent waves lapped across the primordial carbon soup of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, was a matter of some concern — is covered fulsomely, and consistently, in all the emissions master trading documents. See:
The absence of [[encumbrance]]s — which was a matter of concern, in the early days of the emissions trading world, while birth pangs nascent fraud still ricocheted and lapped across the carbon soup of the primordial EU Emissions Trading Scheme — is covered fulsomely, consistently — if not a little defensively — in all the emissions master trading documents.  
 
See:
* “{{euaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (para {{euaprov|(d)(vii)}} in the {{emissionsannex}}
* “{{euaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (para {{euaprov|(d)(vii)}} in the {{emissionsannex}}
*“{{ietaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{ietaprov|5.3}}) in the {{ietama}} and, of all things
*“{{ietaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{ietaprov|5.3}}) in the {{ietama}} and, of all things
*“{{efetaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{efetaprov|6.3}}) in the {{efetma}} Allowances Annex.
*“{{efetaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{efetaprov|6.3}}) in the {{efeta}}.
Here is a {{diff|77163|77164}} of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, {{diff|77164|77167}} IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the {{diff|77163|77167}} of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you.
Here is a {{diff|77163|77164}} of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, {{diff|77164|77167}} IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the {{diff|77163|77167}} of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you.
''We also have a special section about {{{{{1}}}|Unauthorised Transfers}} (being ISDA Section [[Unauthorised Transfers - Emissions Annex Provision|(d)(vii)(4)]], IETA Clause [[Unauthorised Transfers - IETA Provision|5.4(d)]] and EFET Clause [[Unauthorised Transfers - EFET Allowance Provision|6.3(d)]]) which goes into all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that goes with breaches of the {{{{{1}}}|No Encumbrances Obligation}} brought about specifically by '''theft'''.''

Latest revision as of 15:49, 14 November 2023

The absence of encumbrances — which was a matter of concern, in the early days of the emissions trading world, while birth pangs nascent fraud still ricocheted and lapped across the carbon soup of the primordial EU Emissions Trading Scheme — is covered fulsomely, consistently — if not a little defensively — in all the emissions master trading documents.

See:

Here is a comparison of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, comparison IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the comparison of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you.

We also have a special section about {{{{{1}}}|Unauthorised Transfers}} (being ISDA Section (d)(vii)(4), IETA Clause 5.4(d) and EFET Clause 6.3(d)) which goes into all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that goes with breaches of the {{{{{1}}}|No Encumbrances Obligation}} brought about specifically by theft.

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:Emissions_No_Encumbrances_comp&oldid=80437"