Template:M tldr isda Party A and Party B: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Unlike most finance contracts, the ISDA has no fixed roles — swaps were formulated as contracts between equals — the labels Party A and Party B reflect that either party can be long or short or be in- or out-of-the-money — this can create documentation glitches through clerical oversight — beyond interdealer relationships, swaps aren’t contracts between equals, but no different from other forms of financed brokerage — belief in bi...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 11:23, 16 December 2023

Unlike most finance contracts, the ISDA has no fixed roles — swaps were formulated as contracts between equals — the labels Party A and Party B reflect that either party can be long or short or be in- or out-of-the-money — this can create documentation glitches through clerical oversight — beyond interdealer relationships, swaps aren’t contracts between equals, but no different from other forms of financed brokerage — belief in bilaterality has led to misdirected regulation — regulation has arguably concentrated, rather than dissipated risk.