From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{fullanat2|isda|5(a)(ii)|2002|5(a)(ii)|1992}} | | {{newisdamanual|5(a)(ii)}} |
| [[Double negative]] heaven in 5(a)(ii)(1): '''not''' complying with an obligation that is '''not''' (''[[inter alia]]'') a payment obligation if '''not''' remedied within a month. In a nutshell:
| |
| {{nuts|2002 ISDA|5(a)(ii)}}
| |
| A failure to perform any agreement, if not cured within 30 days, is an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}, except for (i) those failures who have their own special {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} (ie {{isdaprov|Failure to Pay or Deliver}}, under Section {{isdaprov|5(a)(i)}}) or those that relate to tax, and which mean the party not complying will just get clipped for tax it rather would not.
| |
| | |
| ====It is an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} not to supply {{isdaprov|documents for delivery}}====
| |
| | |
| A failure to {{isdaprov|Furnish Specified Information}} — ie those {{isdaprov|documents for delivery}} specified in {{isdaprov|Part 3}} of the {{isdama}}, adverted to in Section {{isdaprov|4(a)(ii)}} ''will'' therefore be an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}, although you have to navigate a needlessly tortured string of clause cross references and [[double negative|double negatives]] to settle upon this conclusion.
| |
| ====Differences====
| |
| | |
| Note the addition of repudiation to the {{2002ma}}.
| |
| {{seealso}}
| |
| *{{isdaprov|Furnish Specified Information}} and sub-limb {{isdaprov|4(a)(ii)}} (documents for delivery) ''but not'' {{isdaprov|4(a)(i)}} or {{isdaprov|4(a)(iii)}} (which relate to tax documents).
| |
| *Section {{isdaprov|3(d)}} representations.
| |
Revision as of 18:41, 5 January 2024