Template:Isda Defaulting Party and Affected Party comp: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "====Defaulting Party and Non-defaulting Party==== {{subst:M comp disc 2002 ISDA Defaulting Party}} ====Affected Party and Non-Affected Party==== {{subst:M comp disc 2002 ISDA Affected Party}}" |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Defaulting Party and Non-defaulting Party==== | ====Defaulting Party and Non-defaulting Party==== | ||
A “{{ | A “{{{{{1}}}|Defaulting Party}}” is one who has committed or suffered, and a “{{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}}” is one who is ''not'' implicated in the commission or sufferance of, an {{{{{1}}}|Event of Default}}. There is something judgmental and contemptuous about a defaulter, that there isn’t about one who is merely ''affected''. | ||
====Affected Party and Non-Affected Party==== | ====Affected Party and Non-Affected Party==== | ||
{{isda Affected Party comp| | {{isda Affected Party comp|{{{1}}}}} |
Latest revision as of 19:20, 6 January 2024
Defaulting Party and Non-defaulting Party
A “{{{{{1}}}|Defaulting Party}}” is one who has committed or suffered, and a “{{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}}” is one who is not implicated in the commission or sufferance of, an {{{{{1}}}|Event of Default}}. There is something judgmental and contemptuous about a defaulter, that there isn’t about one who is merely affected.
Affected Party and Non-Affected Party
Not even ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ could confect something worthwhile to say which might improve this Spartan piece of text. But note the concept of {{{{{1}}}|Affected Party}} is sprayed liberally throughout Section {{{{{1}}}|5(b)}}, and it means something different in almost every context so you’re guaranteed to have fun there.
Elsewhere there is much monkeying around as regards the concept of {{{{{1}}}|Illegality}}, particularly insofar as it relates to {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}}s, and the newly introduced Force Majeure.