It is my understanding that: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
How one says “I think”, when one is not thinking.
How one says “I think”, when one is not thinking.


if great works of philosophy were written by [[mediocre lawyer]]s: “It is the understanding of the undersigned that the aforementioned is in existence.” <br>
If great works of philosophy were written by [[mediocre lawyer]]s: “It is the understanding of the undersigned that the aforementioned is in existence.” <br>


''Cogito, ergo sum''. <br>
''Cogito, ergo sum''. <br>
Line 7: Line 7:
I think, therefore I am. <br>
I think, therefore I am. <br>


{{plainenglish}}
 
{{c|Epistemology}}

Latest revision as of 11:32, 13 August 2024

How one says “I think”, when one is not thinking.

If great works of philosophy were written by mediocre lawyers: “It is the understanding of the undersigned that the aforementioned is in existence.”

Cogito, ergo sum.

I think, therefore I am.