Template:Investment research and the Investment Advisers Act 1940: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fullanat|sea|28(e)|1934}}
{{fullanat|sea|28(e)|1934}}
===[[Investment research]] and [[Investment Advisers Act]]: a [[safe harbor]] for [[broker/dealers]]===
===[[Investment research]] and [[Investment Advisers Act]]: a [[safe harbor]] for [[broker/dealers]]===
''Unless there is a [[safe harbor]]''<ref>Just wait!! There IS!</ref>, paying a [[broker/dealer]] for [[investment research]] creates issues under the [[Investment Advisers Act]] because the SEC considers a fee for research “advice” to be “special compensation”, for which a person must be a [[registered investment adviser]]<ref>Details fiends: see Section 202(a)(11) of the [[Investment Advisers Act]].</ref>.
''Unless there is a [[safe harbor]]''<ref>Just wait!! There IS!</ref>, paying a [[broker/dealer]] for [[investment research]] creates issues under the [[Investment Advisers Act]] because the [[SEC]] considers a fee for research “advice” to be “special compensation”, for which a person must be a [[registered investment adviser]]<ref>Details fiends: see Section 202(a)(11) of the [[Investment Advisers Act]].</ref> under the [[Investment Advisers Act of 1940]].


Typically, [[broker dealer]]s are not [[registered investment adviser]]s.
Hey - stay with me. Stop staring out the window. This ''is'' interesting.<ref>To a [[US attorney]].</ref>
 
Typically, [[broker dealer]]s are ''not'' [[registered investment adviser]]s. Can be, but usually aren’t.
   
   
There ''is'', of course, a [[safe harbor]]. I t is set out in Section {{seaprov|28(e)}} of the [[Securities Exchange Act of 1934]]: to qualify for it, a [[broker/dealer]] ’s advice must be “solely incidental” to its provision of “[[broker/dealer]] services”.
There ''is'', of course, a [[safe harbor]]. It is set out in Section {{seaprov|28(e)}} of the [[Securities Exchange Act of 1934]]: to qualify for it, a [[broker/dealer]]’s advice must be “solely incidental” to its provision of “[[broker/dealer]] services”.
 
Under [[SEC]] guidance “[[commission]]s” may be used to purchase [[investment research|research]] on a “[[soft dollar]]” basis. 


Under {{tag|SEC}} guidance to the Section {{seaprov|28(e)}} [[safe harbor]], “[[commission]]s” may be used to purchase [[investment research|research]] on a [[soft dollar]] basis.
The definition of “[[commission]]” is important:
:''a fee that a [[broker/dealer]] levies for executing a securities transaction as [[agent]].''


The definition of “[[commission]]” is important: a fee that a [[broker/dealer]] levies for executing a securities transaction as [[agent]].  The SEC extended the [[safe harbor]] to certain [[riskless principal]] transactions in [[exchange-listed securities]] in 2001, [[riskless principal]] really being a form of [[quasi-agency]].
===Extensions and exceptions===
*'''[[Riskless principal]]: OK''': The [[SEC]] extended the [[safe harbor]] to certain [[riskless principal]] transactions in [[exchange-listed securities]] in 2001, [[riskless principal]] really being a form of [[quasi-agency]].


'''[[The safe harbor]] doesn’t apply to [[Synthetic equity swap|swap]] transactions''': By definition swap transactions are bilateral, full-principal contracts. they are not agency or [[riskless principal]]<ref>You could argue this isn't true for delta-one synthetic equity prime brokerage arrangements, it if you know what’s good for you, you wouldn’t.</ref>. The [[swap dealer]] takes a fee (as [[principal]]) that is no sense a “[[commission]]”.  The swap dealer does not act as [[agent]] (or [[quasi-agent]]).  
*'''[[Synthetic equity swap|Swap]]: ''Not'' OK''': '''[[The safe harbor]] doesn’t apply to [[Synthetic equity swap|swap]] transactions''': By definition swaps are [[bilateral]], full-principal contracts. They cannot be [[agency]] or [[riskless principal]]<ref>You could argue this isn't true for delta-one [[synthetic prime brokerage]] arrangements but, it if you know what’s good for you, you wouldn’t.</ref>. The [[swap dealer]] takes a fee (as [[principal]]) that is no sense a “[[commission]]”.  The swap [[dealer]] does not act as [[agent]] (or [[quasi-agent]]).  


A superbly literalist, non-sensical view of the world, but there you have it. It wouldn’t be the first time, America.
A superbly literalist, non-sensical view of the world, but there you have it. It wouldn’t be the first time, America.
====What does this mean then?====
====So, what does this mean then?====
This means a US [[broker-dealer]] can provide research to its clients without having to register with the {{tag|SEC}} as an [[investment adviser]] so long as it avoids accepting any “[[special compensation]]” in connection with the research. A bundled trading [[commission]] is the traditional means of compensating a broker-dealer for execution and research.  
This means a US [[broker-dealer]] can provide [[Investment research|research]] to its clients without having to register with the [[SEC]] as an [[investment adviser]] ''so long as it doesn’t earn any “[[special compensation]]” relating to the research. A bundled trading [[commission]] is the traditional means of compensating a broker-dealer for execution and research in a way that avoids special compensation.


Let me guess: {{isia}}
===Sorry you asked?===
Let me guess: You’re thinking, “{{isia}}”. I know ''I’m'' sorry you asked.


====Resources====
{{Sa}}
*[https://www.sec.gov/rules/interp/34-23170.pdf SEC interpretative guidance]
*[https://www.sec.gov/rules/interp/34-23170.pdf SEC interpretative guidance]

Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024

Securities Exchange Act Anatomy™

Section 28(e), Securities Exchange Act 1934 (view template)

28(e)(1) No person using the mails, or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, in the exercise of investment discretion with respect to an account shall be deemed to have acted unlawfully or to have breached a fiduciary duty under State or Federal law unless expressly provided to the contrary by a law enacted by the Congress or any State subsequent to the date of enactment of the Securities Acts Amendments of 1975 solely by reason of his having caused the account to pay a member of an exchange, broker, or dealer an amount of commission for effecting a securities transaction in excess of the amount of commission another member of an exchange, broker, or dealer would have charged for effecting that transaction, if such person determined in good faith that such amount of commission was reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by such member, broker, or dealer, viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or his overall responsibilities with respect to the accounts as to which he exercises investment discretion. This subsection is exclusive and plenary insofar as conduct is covered by the foregoing, unless otherwise expressly provided by contract: Provided, however, That nothing in this subsection shall be construed to impair or limit the power of the Commission under any other provision of this title or otherwise.


Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Investment research and Investment Advisers Act: a safe harbor for broker/dealers

Unless there is a safe harbor[1], paying a broker/dealer for investment research creates issues under the Investment Advisers Act because the SEC considers a fee for research “advice” to be “special compensation”, for which a person must be a registered investment adviser[2] under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Hey - stay with me. Stop staring out the window. This is interesting.[3]

Typically, broker dealers are not registered investment advisers. Can be, but usually aren’t.

There is, of course, a safe harbor. It is set out in Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: to qualify for it, a broker/dealer’s advice must be “solely incidental” to its provision of “broker/dealer services”.

Under SEC guidance “commissions” may be used to purchase research on a “soft dollar” basis.

The definition of “commission” is important:

a fee that a broker/dealer levies for executing a securities transaction as agent.

Extensions and exceptions

A superbly literalist, non-sensical view of the world, but there you have it. It wouldn’t be the first time, America.

So, what does this mean then?

This means a US broker-dealer can provide research to its clients without having to register with the SEC as an investment adviser so long as it doesn’t earn any “special compensation” relating to the research. A bundled trading commission is the traditional means of compensating a broker-dealer for execution and research in a way that avoids special compensation.

Sorry you asked?

Let me guess: You’re thinking, “I’m sorry I asked”. I know I’m sorry you asked.

See also

  1. ↑ Just wait!! There IS!
  2. ↑ Details fiends: see Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act.
  3. ↑ To a US attorney.
  4. ↑ You could argue this isn't true for delta-one synthetic prime brokerage arrangements but, it if you know what’s good for you, you wouldn’t.
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:Investment_research_and_the_Investment_Advisers_Act_1940&oldid=88444"