Terminated Transactions - 1987 ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{nman|isda|1987|Terminated Transaction}}" |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{nman|isda|1987|Terminated | {{nman|isda|1987|Terminated Transactions}} |
Latest revision as of 08:50, 15 August 2024
1987 ISDA Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Agreement
A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™ Go premium
Crosscheck: Terminated Transactions in a Nutshell™
Original text
See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.
Resources and Navigation
|
Comparisons
The 1992 ISDA just really tidied up the expression from the 1987 ISDA — here is a comparison.
The 2002 ISDA takes the 1992 ISDA adds a little detail to deal with Illegality and the newly-introduced Force Majeure notices — here is a comparison.
Basics
“Terminated Transactions” might help answer the vexed question of what that curious “by not more than 20 days’ notice” period for a close-out notice under Section 6(a) is meant to achieve. You may have a Transaction that is due to roll off and you want it to settle before you close out the portfolio. It is not a very compelling reason, in fairness. But it at least suggests someone on the ISDA drafting commitee was thinking about it, even if not especially insightfully.
Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics👇
|
See also
Template:Isda Terminated Transactions sa