|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{casenote|a|casenote| | | {{cn}}This is the present selection of cases in the [[Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports]], a most excellent but roguish reporting service wholly unacknowledged by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting. All responsibility for sober and sensible reproduction of the facts wholly [[disclaimer|disclaimed]]. Use at your own risk. |
| [[File:JCLR.png|center|frameless|300px]]
| |
| }}This is the present selection of cases in the [[Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports]], a reporting service wholly unacknowledged by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting. All responsibility for sober and sensible reproduction of the facts wholly [[disclaimer|disclaimed]]. Use at your own risk. | |
|
| |
|
| As at March 2002 this was the collection of cases:
| | {{subtableflex|45|<categorytree mode="pages" namespaces="Main">Case notes</categorytree>}} |
| | |
| A
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|AP Picture Houses v Wednesbury}}
| |
| | |
| B
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Balfour v Balfour}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Barclays v Unicredit}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Bibby Financial Services Ltd v Magson}}
| |
| | |
| C
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Chudley v Clydesdale Bank plc}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Concord Trust v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Covenant to execute
| |
| *{{casenote|Crowther v Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd}}
| |
| | |
| D
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Donoghue v Stevenson}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd}}
| |
| | |
| E
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Enron v TXU}}
| |
| | |
| F
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Fardell v Potts}}
| |
| | |
| G
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Geldof Metaalconstructie v Carves}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Goldsworthy v Brickell}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc}}
| |
| | |
| H
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Hadley v Baxendale}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Heald v Kenworthy}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Hedley Byrne v Heller}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Henderson v Merrett}}
| |
| | |
| L
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Lisle-Mainwaring v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Lomas v Firth Rixson}}
| |
| | |
| M
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Marine Trade v Pioneer}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Metavante v Lehman}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Miller v Jackson}}
| |
| | |
| N
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen}}
| |
| | |
| P
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Pioneer v Cosco}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Pioneer v TMT}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Polypearl Limited v E.ON Energy Solutions Limited}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Poretta v Superior Dowel Company}}
| |
| *{{casenote|President of India v Lips Maritime Corporation}}
| |
| | |
| R
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|RBS Rights Issue Litigation}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Re Lehman Brothers International}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Re Spectrum Plus}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Rylands v Fletcher}}
| |
| | |
| S
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Secure Capital v Credit Suisse}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Sturges v Bridgman}}
| |
| | |
| T
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Thompson v Davenport}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Three Rivers No. 5}}
| |
| | |
| U
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Ultramares v Touche}}
| |
| | |
| W
| |
| | |
| *{{casenote|Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle}}
| |
| *{{casenote|West Midland Baptist (Trust) Association Inc v Birmingham Corporation}}
| |
| *{{casenote|Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions}}
| |
