Template:Process agent capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A [[process agent]] for an agreement subject to the jurisdiction the courts of [[England and Wales]] is a business located [[England and Wales|England or Wales]] (or, in theory, their adjacent territorial waters) which accepts service of legal proceedings filed in English courts on behalf of a person who has no permanent place of business in England or Wales.
{{qd|Process agent|/ˈprəʊsɛs ˈeɪʤᵊnt/|n|An agent located ''in'' a jurisdiction who is appointed by a contracting counterparty ''outside'' that jurisdiction to accept service of legal proceedings filed against it in the courts of that jurisdiction, to discharge the procedural requirement that they are physically served within the jurisdiction.}}


The rules of English [[Civil Procedure Rules|civil court procedure]] require notice of legal proceedings (called “[[process]]”)  before an English (or Welsh) court to be physically served on the defendant in [[England or Wales]] (or, at the limit, in their adjacent territorial waters<ref>In the [https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part02#2.3 Civil Procedure Rules] the “jurisdiction” is defined as “unless the context requires otherwise, England and Wales ''and any part of the territorial waters of the United Kingdom adjoining England and Wales''” so, therefore, the UK’s territorial waters ''adjoining Scotland or Northern Ireland'' are out of bounds.</ref>. Service in [[Scotland]] — or its territorial waters — will not do. This means you can serve process on someone rowing a boat in the Bristol Channel, but not in Inverness, much less on someone escaping in rowing a boat to, for example, the Isle of Skye.   
{{drop|F|or English law}} contracts the jurisdiction in question is that of “the courts of [[England and Wales]]” — there is no such thing as United Kingdom law — the {{pl|https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part02#2.3|rules of English civil court procedure}}<ref>Rule 6.11 of Part 6, details freaks.</ref> require process physically to be served within [[England and Wales|England or Wales]] (or, in theory, their adjacent territorial waters<ref>I find the idea of serving in territorial waters strangely fascinating. In the {{pl|https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part02#2.3|rules of English civil court procedure}} “jurisdiction” is defined as “unless the context requires otherwise, England and Wales ''and any part of the territorial waters of the United Kingdom adjoining England and Wales''” so, therefore, those of the Her Majesty’s territorial waters which ''adjoin Scotland or Northern Ireland'' are out of bounds.</ref>). Service in [[Scotland]] — or ''its'' territorial waters — will not do. This means you can serve process on someone rowing a boat in the Bristol Channel, but not in Inverness, much less on someone escaping in rowing a boat to, for example, the Isle of Skye.   


This means if you have a {{tag|contract}} with a counterparty who has no place of business in England or Wales (or their territorial waters), it will need to appoint a [[process agent]] on whom you can serve court papers should, heaven forfend, you need to.
A contracting counterparty whom you cannot rely on being in England or Wales should you have to sue it — one who has no permanent place of business there — you might ask to appoint as its agent a company who reliably ''will'' be there, and who is prepared to receive process served upon the counterparty and pass it on to head office. That person is a “process agent”.  


===[[Jurisdiction]], not [[governing law]]===
The best kind of process agent is an English-domiciled affiliate of the contracting entity who is happy to perform that role, as it generally will do it for free. But if you don’t have one, there are dedicated process agency businesses who will act as your process agent for, naturally enough, a suitably outrageous fee.
Point for details freaks: it is the ''[[jurisdiction]]'' of the English courts and not English ''[[governing law]]'' law that matters. A contract governed by [[Swiss law]] but subject to the jurisdiction of the English courts<ref>This sounds ridiculous, I know, but it does happen. The JC has personal direct experience.</ref> would still need an English or Welsh process agent. In theory — and, yes, a ripe theory it would be — a contract governed by [[English law]] but subject to the [[exclusive jurisdiction]] of ''Italian'' courts<ref>This sounds ridiculous, I know, and ''is'' ridiculous. The [[JC]] has ''no'' personal direct experience of this (and does not want any, so you can save your postcards).</ref> would not.
 
This also means that an agreement subject to some ghastly foreign law and the [[non-exclusive jurisdiction]] of some ghastly foreign courts, and which therefore could, in theory, come before an English or Welsh court, would require a process agent in England, Wales, or their territorial waters for that to happen. This would look most odd in the negotiation process. The [[JC]] hereby offers a free bag of sweeties to the first person who can show they have successfully inserted the appointment of an English process agent into a foreign law agreement for this reason.<ref>Up to fifty new pence in value, postage and packing excepted. Judge’s decision final is arbitrary, crotchety, and no correspondence will be [[entered into]] unless he feels like it, which he probably will. Competition not open to friends, relations or acquaintances of the [[JC]].</ref>

Latest revision as of 09:35, 8 October 2024

Process agent
/ˈprəʊsɛs ˈeɪʤᵊnt/ (n.)

An agent located in a jurisdiction who is appointed by a contracting counterparty outside that jurisdiction to accept service of legal proceedings filed against it in the courts of that jurisdiction, to discharge the procedural requirement that they are physically served within the jurisdiction.

For English law contracts the jurisdiction in question is that of “the courts of England and Wales” — there is no such thing as United Kingdom law — the rules of English civil court procedure[1] require process physically to be served within England or Wales (or, in theory, their adjacent territorial waters[2]). Service in Scotland — or its territorial waters — will not do. This means you can serve process on someone rowing a boat in the Bristol Channel, but not in Inverness, much less on someone escaping in rowing a boat to, for example, the Isle of Skye.

A contracting counterparty whom you cannot rely on being in England or Wales should you have to sue it — one who has no permanent place of business there — you might ask to appoint as its agent a company who reliably will be there, and who is prepared to receive process served upon the counterparty and pass it on to head office. That person is a “process agent”.

The best kind of process agent is an English-domiciled affiliate of the contracting entity who is happy to perform that role, as it generally will do it for free. But if you don’t have one, there are dedicated process agency businesses who will act as your process agent for, naturally enough, a suitably outrageous fee.

  1. Rule 6.11 of Part 6, details freaks.
  2. I find the idea of serving in territorial waters strangely fascinating. In the rules of English civil court procedure “jurisdiction” is defined as “unless the context requires otherwise, England and Wales and any part of the territorial waters of the United Kingdom adjoining England and Wales” so, therefore, those of the Her Majesty’s territorial waters which adjoin Scotland or Northern Ireland are out of bounds.