Agreement to Deliver Documents - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{anat|isda}}
{{nman|isda|2002|Schedule Part 3}}
The part of the ISDA {{isdaprov|Schedule}} where you agree who is going to [[Documents for delivery - ISDA Provision|deliver]] what documents to whom, when, and whether they'll be covered by the Section {{isdaprov|3(d)}} representation — in other words whether you're warranting as to their accuracy, completeness and truth.
 
{{Specified Information and Breach of Agreement}}
{{oddspot}}
Also the part of the ISDA suite most likely to challenge the [[Microsoft Word]] formatting skills of an ISDA [[negotiator]]. That table’s a bastard.
 
{{seealso}}
*{{isdaprov|Documents for delivery}}
*{{isdaprov|Breach of Agreement}}
{{ref}}

Latest revision as of 17:04, 4 February 2024

2002 ISDA Master Agreement

A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Schedule Part 3 in a Nutshell

The JC’s Nutshell summary of this term has moved uptown to the subscription-only ninja tier. For the cost of ½ a weekly 🍺 you can get it here. Sign up at Substack. You can even ask questions! Ask about it here.

Original text

Part 3. Agreement to Deliver Documents. For the purpose of Sections 4(a)(i) and 4(a)(ii) of this Agreement, each party agrees to deliver the following documents, as applicable:―
(a) Tax forms, documents or certificates to be delivered are[: none][:―

Party required to deliver document Form/Document/Certificate Date by which to be delivered
.......... .......... ..........
.......... .......... ..........
.......... .......... ..........

(b) Other documents to be delivered are[: none][:―

Party required to deliver document Form/Document/Certificate Date by which to be delivered Covered by Section 3(d) Representation
.......... .......... .......... [Yes][No]
.......... .......... .......... [Yes][No]
.......... .......... .......... [Yes][No]
See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.
The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext)
Preamble Pre Pre Pre
Interpretation 1 1 1
Obligns/Payment 2 2 2
Representations 3 3 3
Agreements 4 4 4
EODs & Term Events 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityFMTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSSCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUM
Early Termination 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculations; Payment DatePayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ET
Transfer 7 7 7
Contractual Currency 8 8 8
Miscellaneous 9 9 9
Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10
Expenses 11 11 11
Notices 12 12 12
Governing Law 13 13 13
Definitions 14 14 14
Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule
Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1
Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2
Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3
Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4
Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5

Resources and Navigation

Index: Click to expand:

Comparisons

The part of the ISDA Schedule where you agree who is going to deliver what documents to whom, when, and whether they’ll be covered by the Section 3(d) representation — in other words whether you’re warranting as to their accuracy, completeness and truth.

Also the part of the ISDA suite most likely to challenge the Microsoft Word formatting skills of an ISDA negotiator. That table’s a bastard.

Basics

Not providing documents for delivery is an Event of Default ... eventually

The importance of promptly sending required documents for delivery goes as follows:

Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics👇
  • JC’s “nutshell” summary of the clause
  • Background reading and long-form essays
    • Audited financial statements: should you warrant that they are accurate?

See also

References