Scribam, ergo salvum sum: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{maximgeneration}} | {{a|latin|}}{{maximgeneration}} | ||
A home-made [[Latin]] motto that speaks to the profound existential fear of all [[legal eagle|cautious solicitors]]. Something is only safe — only free from the black terror of the unknown that has a lair in the darkest reaches of every attorney’s heart — once it is ''written down''. | |||
The worst of it is that it isn’t even necessarily true: even if you write it down, the Leviathan still waits, and growls, and wants to eviscerate you, my young [[Chicken Licken|chicken]]. You may park some of those fears with an [[entire agreement]] clause, and [[no oral modification]], but still a [[contract]] and its [[Written contract|written articulation]] are not the same thing. | |||
The [[Written contract|written articulation of a legal agreement]] — the paper it is written on, in other words — is no more than evidence of that agreement: it isn’t “the agreement” itself. A [[Contract|legal agreement]] is a [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] thing; a Platonic form: it might be we can only ever see its shadow, thrown across a craggy cave wall: but we shouldn’t confuse that contorted, shifting shape with the intellectual construct — effable — but unchained from the mortal, papery coil that represents it in this world. | |||
The [[Written contract|written articulation of a legal agreement]] — the paper it is written on, in other words — is no more than evidence of that agreement: it isn’t “the agreement” itself. A [[Contract|legal agreement]] is a [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] thing; a Platonic form: it might be we can only ever see its shadow, thrown across a craggy cave wall: but we | |||
If, carelessly, the parties have failed to correctly document terms of the actual agreement between them, but they are, nonetheless, performing it, they can be held to it, as long as you can prove what the agreement actually was, whatever some flesh-weak piece of paper might say. A legally binding agreement might take the form of speech, non-[[verbal]] representations, winks, nods, grunts, insinuations, and outrageous untruths your [[sales]]person has trotted out to the client while plying him with drink. | If, carelessly, the parties have failed to correctly document terms of the actual agreement between them, but they are, nonetheless, performing it, they can be held to it, as long as you can prove what the agreement actually was, whatever some flesh-weak piece of paper might say. A legally binding agreement might take the form of speech, non-[[verbal]] representations, winks, nods, grunts, insinuations, and outrageous untruths your [[sales]]person has trotted out to the client while plying him with drink. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
None of these things will be in your [[written contract]], though be assured if your client is a [[little old lady]] the courts will expend considerable energy in finding out that they took place and formed a vital part of the [[consensus ad idem]]. | None of these things will be in your [[written contract]], though be assured if your client is a [[little old lady]] the courts will expend considerable energy in finding out that they took place and formed a vital part of the [[consensus ad idem]]. | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Written contract]] | *[[Written contract]] | ||
*[[Disclaimer]] | *[[Disclaimer]] | ||
| Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
*[[Chicken Licken]] | *[[Chicken Licken]] | ||
{{c|Metaphysics}} {{egg}}{{draft}} | {{c|Metaphysics}} {{egg}}{{draft}} | ||
{{C|Risk}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024
|
The JC’s guide to pithy Latin adages
|
This article comes to you from the Jolly Contrarian’s legal maxim generation service.
A home-made Latin motto that speaks to the profound existential fear of all cautious solicitors. Something is only safe — only free from the black terror of the unknown that has a lair in the darkest reaches of every attorney’s heart — once it is written down.
The worst of it is that it isn’t even necessarily true: even if you write it down, the Leviathan still waits, and growls, and wants to eviscerate you, my young chicken. You may park some of those fears with an entire agreement clause, and no oral modification, but still a contract and its written articulation are not the same thing.
The written articulation of a legal agreement — the paper it is written on, in other words — is no more than evidence of that agreement: it isn’t “the agreement” itself. A legal agreement is a metaphysical thing; a Platonic form: it might be we can only ever see its shadow, thrown across a craggy cave wall: but we shouldn’t confuse that contorted, shifting shape with the intellectual construct — effable — but unchained from the mortal, papery coil that represents it in this world.
If, carelessly, the parties have failed to correctly document terms of the actual agreement between them, but they are, nonetheless, performing it, they can be held to it, as long as you can prove what the agreement actually was, whatever some flesh-weak piece of paper might say. A legally binding agreement might take the form of speech, non-verbal representations, winks, nods, grunts, insinuations, and outrageous untruths your salesperson has trotted out to the client while plying him with drink.
None of these things will be in your written contract, though be assured if your client is a little old lady the courts will expend considerable energy in finding out that they took place and formed a vital part of the consensus ad idem.