There is no machine for judging poetry: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Life is messy and intractable, and it will defy your easy attempts to formularise it. | {{a|maxim|}}Life is messy and intractable, and it will defy your easy attempts to formularise it. Eighty percent of it will meet all your criteria. The other twenty will bugger up your plans. So: | ||
Beware the fat tail | Beware the [[fat tail]], and remember ''[[The Dead Poets’ Society]]''. ''There is no machine for judging [[poetry]]''. | ||
{{ | {{subtableflex|45|{{understandingpoetry}}}} | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Symbol processing]] | |||
*[[Fat tail]] | |||
*[[The Dead Poets’ Society]] | |||
*[[Maxims for a happy life]] | |||
*[[Peotry]] | |||
{{c|Peotry}} |
Latest revision as of 14:28, 19 October 2023
|
Life is messy and intractable, and it will defy your easy attempts to formularise it. Eighty percent of it will meet all your criteria. The other twenty will bugger up your plans. So: Beware the fat tail, and remember The Dead Poets’ Society. There is no machine for judging poetry.
KEATING: Gentlemen, open your text to page twenty-one of the introduction. Mr. Perry, will you read the opening paragraph of the preface, entitled “Understanding Poetry”?
KEATING: Excrement. That’s what I think of Mr. J. Evans Pritchard. We’re not laying pipe, we’re talking about poetry. |