Code is Law: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "Are the days of legal {{tag|contract}}s as discrete ontological things, abstracted and divorced from our bio- and ecomechanical beings, numbered? {{seealso}} *Smart contra..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Are the days of legal | {{a|technology|}}Are the days of legal [[contract]]s as discrete [[Ontology|ontological]] things, abstracted and divorced from our bio- and eco-mechanical beings, numbered? | ||
{{ | Not really, in this contrarian’s view. If they were, they would have gone by now. | ||
Code is law is a variation of the Boolean view of language that it is an exercise in symbol processing in which meaning and data are identical, in contradiction to the idea that meaning is a “[[betweenness]]” thing | |||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Smart contract]] | *[[Smart contract]] | ||
*{{br|Code: Version 2.0}} | *{{br|Code: Version 2.0}} | ||
*{{ | *{{author|Lawrence Lessig}} | ||
*[[Technology]] | |||
{{c|Metaphysics}} | {{c|Metaphysics}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024
|
JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
|
Are the days of legal contracts as discrete ontological things, abstracted and divorced from our bio- and eco-mechanical beings, numbered?
Not really, in this contrarian’s view. If they were, they would have gone by now.
Code is law is a variation of the Boolean view of language that it is an exercise in symbol processing in which meaning and data are identical, in contradiction to the idea that meaning is a “betweenness” thing