Code is Law: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Are the days of legal {{tag|contract}}s as discrete [[Ontology|ontological]] things, abstracted and divorced from our bio- and eco-mechanical beings, numbered?
{{a|technology|}}Are the days of legal [[contract]]s as discrete [[Ontology|ontological]] things, abstracted and divorced from our bio- and eco-mechanical beings, numbered?


Not really, in this contrarian’s view. If they were, they would have gone by now.
Not really, in this contrarian’s view. If they were, they would have gone by now.


{{seealso}}
Code is law is a variation of the Boolean view of language that it is an exercise in symbol processing in which meaning and data are identical, in contradiction to the idea that meaning is a “[[betweenness]]” thing
 
{{sa}}
*[[Smart  contract]]
*[[Smart  contract]]
*{{br|Code: Version 2.0}}
*{{br|Code: Version 2.0}}
*{{author|Lawrence Lessig}}
*{{author|Lawrence Lessig}}
*{{t|Technology}}
*[[Technology]]
{{c|Metaphysics}}
{{c|Metaphysics}}

Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024

JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Are the days of legal contracts as discrete ontological things, abstracted and divorced from our bio- and eco-mechanical beings, numbered?

Not really, in this contrarian’s view. If they were, they would have gone by now.

Code is law is a variation of the Boolean view of language that it is an exercise in symbol processing in which meaning and data are identical, in contradiction to the idea that meaning is a “betweenness” thing

See also