Triumph: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{popsong|Triumph|Wu Tang Clan|7205725}} It is a bravado performance no doubt but fundamentally incoherent. Novation seems to be the name of a synthesiser - which google reve...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{popsong|Triumph|Wu Tang Clan|7205725}} | {{popsong|Triumph|Wu Tang Clan|7205725}} | ||
It is a bravado performance no doubt but fundamentally incoherent. Novation seems to be the | It is a bravado performance no doubt but fundamentally incoherent. Judging by the context, “[[Novation]]” seems to be not the tripartite mutually agreed transfer of rights and liabilities with we [[Mediocre lawyer|scholarly legal folk]] love, but a brand of synthesiser — which the Google reveals to be manufactured by [https://novationmusic.com/ Novation Digital Music Systems Limited]. | ||
But that leads to its own question. Why did ''they'' name their synthesiser company after a [[novation|technical legal arrangement between three parties to transfer rights and obligations under a contract]]? | |||
Did it just sort of sound space aged? | |||
{{popmangle}} | {{popmangle}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:46, 21 March 2019
Triumph by Wu Tang Clan
(Enjoy the lyrics, at your own risk, here)
It is a bravado performance no doubt but fundamentally incoherent. Judging by the context, “Novation” seems to be not the tripartite mutually agreed transfer of rights and liabilities with we scholarly legal folk love, but a brand of synthesiser — which the Google reveals to be manufactured by Novation Digital Music Systems Limited.
But that leads to its own question. Why did they name their synthesiser company after a technical legal arrangement between three parties to transfer rights and obligations under a contract?
Did it just sort of sound space aged?