Template:M summ 2002 ISDA Unpaid Amounts: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "You may want to know where {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amounts}} feature in the {{isdama}}. The answer: In {{isdaprov|Payments on Early Termination}}: Section {{isdaprov|6(e)(i)}} (for..."
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
You may want to know where {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amounts}} feature in the {{isdama}}. The answer: In {{isdaprov|Payments on Early Termination}}: Section {{isdaprov|6(e)(i)}} (for {{isdaprov|Events of Default}}) and {{isdaprov|6(e)(ii)}} (for {{isdaprov|Termination Events}}) and {{isdaprov|6(e)(iv)}} ({{isdaprov|Adjustment for Illegality or Force Majeure Event}}).
[[Unpaid Amount - ISDA Provision|If]] you think of an ISDA {{isdaprov|Transaction}} as comprising offsetting payment streams, these payments fall into one of three [[ontological]] categories:
*'''Been and gone''': Those that are already paid: settled, gone, checked into the hereafter; on permanent location in that foreign country we call the past — we care less about these; they are but a fossil record: they pose no risk, attract no capital and excite no prospects of revenue or compensation.
*'''Yet to come''': Due to be paid, or delivered, at a specified date in the future. Perhaps fixed; perhaps yet to be determined, but conceptually still out there. It is, conventionally, by off setting the provisional present value of these future cashflows, that we value “the {{isdaprov|Transaction}}” — this is what we call its “[[Replacement Transaction - ISDA Provision|replacement cost]]”.
*'''The twilight zone''': That weird inter-regnum of payments whose due date has passed, and which ''should have'' have been paid, and thus emigrated permanently to that foreign country but, for whatever reason — inattention, inability, defiance, or the affordances of Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}} — they have not yet been made, so they need to be worried about, accounted for and factored into things, over and above the “replacement” value of the trade.

Latest revision as of 11:06, 23 June 2023

If you think of an ISDA Transaction as comprising offsetting payment streams, these payments fall into one of three ontological categories:

  • Been and gone: Those that are already paid: settled, gone, checked into the hereafter; on permanent location in that foreign country we call the past — we care less about these; they are but a fossil record: they pose no risk, attract no capital and excite no prospects of revenue or compensation.
  • Yet to come: Due to be paid, or delivered, at a specified date in the future. Perhaps fixed; perhaps yet to be determined, but conceptually still out there. It is, conventionally, by off setting the provisional present value of these future cashflows, that we value “the Transaction” — this is what we call its “replacement cost”.
  • The twilight zone: That weird inter-regnum of payments whose due date has passed, and which should have have been paid, and thus emigrated permanently to that foreign country but, for whatever reason — inattention, inability, defiance, or the affordances of Section 2(a)(iii) — they have not yet been made, so they need to be worried about, accounted for and factored into things, over and above the “replacement” value of the trade.