Two Affected Parties - 1992 ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{manual|MI|1992|6(b)(iii)|Section|6(b)(iii)|comp}}" |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{isda92manual|6(b)(iii)}} |
Latest revision as of 13:29, 30 June 2023
1992 ISDA Master Agreement A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™
6(b)(iii) in all its glory
Related agreements and comparisons
Resources and Navigation
|
Overview
Summary
Handwaving appeals to one another’s good natures with this talk of reasonableness and, of course, both parties will probably be incentivised to keep the trade on foot if some unfortunate tax eventuality comes about — seeing as they were incentivised enough to start it —but ultimately, this is an agreement to agree, however you dress it up, and is as contractually enforceable as one. That is, not very.
Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics 👇
|
- The JC’s famous Nutshell™ summary of this clause