Template:M summ GMSLA 25: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[ | [[Recording - GMSLA Provision|Another]] one from the venerable tradition of things not needing saying that still routinely get said — contracts are the business of setting out: | ||
:(i) what you ''must'' do but otherwise need not; | :(i) what you ''must'' do but otherwise need not; | ||
:(ii) what you ''must not'' do but otherwise could; | :(ii) what you ''must not'' do but otherwise could; | ||
:(iii) what you ''may'' do, but otherwise could not. | :(iii) what you ''may'' do, but otherwise could not. | ||
Recording your own phone conversations meets none of those categories, though what with the current fashion for paternalistic privacy legislation, recording someone else’s speech does at least import some regulatory obligations for the collection and processing of that information, and come to think of it, you might be in breach of [[copyright]] otherwise — though none more so than if you took notes — and you would have a job articulating your [[damages]] in a statement of claim. | Recording your own phone conversations meets none of those categories, though what with the current fashion for paternalistic privacy legislation, recording someone else’s speech does at least import some regulatory obligations for the collection and processing of that information, and come to think of it, you might be in breach of [[copyright]] otherwise — though none more so than if you took notes — and you would have a job articulating your [[damages]] in a statement of claim. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:00, 28 December 2020
Another one from the venerable tradition of things not needing saying that still routinely get said — contracts are the business of setting out:
- (i) what you must do but otherwise need not;
- (ii) what you must not do but otherwise could;
- (iii) what you may do, but otherwise could not.
Recording your own phone conversations meets none of those categories, though what with the current fashion for paternalistic privacy legislation, recording someone else’s speech does at least import some regulatory obligations for the collection and processing of that information, and come to think of it, you might be in breach of copyright otherwise — though none more so than if you took notes — and you would have a job articulating your damages in a statement of claim.