Non-solicitation - NDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replaced content with "{{sman|nda||Non-solicitation}}")
Tag: Replaced
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|confi|}}What place do restrictive trade practices have in an agreement about the sharing of {{confiprov|confidential information}}? None. Strike it out and be done with it. If the other guy complains, tell him to pay his staff a decent wage and let them have some time off every now and then.
{{sman|nda||Non-solicitation}}
{{sa}}
*[[Gardening leave]]

Latest revision as of 13:30, 6 June 2024

NDA Anatomy™
JC’s guide to non-standard confidentiality agreements.
For the OneNDA, see the OneNDA Anatomy

A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Original text:

Resources and Navigation

Index: Click to expand:

Overview

Template:Nda Non-solicitation comp

Summary

You are agreeing to provide documents and information on the promise that the other side won’t misuse them. An NDA is not an engagement letter, it does not — should not — imply some sort of uberrimae fidei relationship — so what place do restrictive trade practices have in an agreement about the sharing of confidential information?

None. Strike it out and be done with it.

If the other guy complains, tell him to pay his staff a decent wage and let them have some time off every now and then. Then they won’t leave.

If that doesn’t do the trick, there should be a separate, specific non-solicitation/non-compete agreement that deals specifically with what the parties wish reasonably to achieve. Don’t shoehorn it into an NDA.

See also

Template:Nda Non-solicitation sa

References