OneNDA: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Redirected page to OneNDA Anatomy)
Tag: New redirect
 
(25 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|design|
#redirect[[OneNDA Anatomy]]
 
[[File:Club.png|450px|frameless|center|Why did it take the legal community two thousand years to come up with this idea?]]
}}Don’t just read about it here: go see: https://www.onenda.org
 
[[Legal eagle]]s ''love'' the idea that standard, [[boilerplate]], tedious terms that make up the lion’s share of commercial legal discourse should be regarded as a common utility; a free public resource, and not some [[secret sauce]] that keeps battalions of [[legal eagle]]s in well-paid but soul-destroying work. Everyone — not just lawyers, come to think of it — likes to believe herself special, privy to something critical; dangerous; ''delicate'' — information that, should it fall into the wrong hands, may wreak great ill upon its owner or the poor unsuspecting random.
 
Kudos, therefore, to the team at the [http://www.lawboutique.co.uk Law Boutique] for doing something about it. The [[JC]] will put his sclerotic old shoulder to the wheel, for whatever that is worth and commends his friends, relations and readers; especially those who occupy places in the firmament higher than his own — that’s more or less all of you — to do what you can to get your own organisations behind this excellent initiative. Start with the NDA, who knows where it may lead?
 
Of course, the effluxion of time, the inevitable [[special pleading]], the [[committee]] drafting to which we agents of the tragic commons resort by irrepressible force of habit may mean this augers into the ground, but we can but try.
 
{{sa}}
*[[Confidentiality agreement]]
*[[ClauseHub: theory]]
*[[ClauseHub]]
*[[Secret sauce]]

Latest revision as of 15:06, 30 May 2024

Redirect to: