Relevant Registry - Emissions Annex Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{manual|DCE|2005|Relevant Registry|Section||short}}" |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{euamanual|Relevant Registry}} |
Latest revision as of 08:25, 16 October 2023
EU Emissions Allowance Transaction Annex to the 2005 ISDA Commodity Definitions A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™
Relevant Registry in all its glory
Comparison See our natty emissions comparison table between the IETA, EFET and ISDA versions of emissions trading docs
Resources and Navigation
|
Overview
The definition of Relevant Registry is more or less the same in all three emissions trading documentation regimes. Compare:
ISDA: Relevant Registry
IETA: Relevant Registry
EFET: Relevant Registry
Summary
Did we need a separate definition of “Relevant Registry”? Does it convey any nuance or additional colour that the lower-cased, colloquial, “relevant Registry” does not. In our humble opinion, it does not. Do we really even need the word relevant? In what world, and why, would one be talking about a Registry that was irrelevant?
Do not get us started on all this business about there being more than one Specified Holding Account.
Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics 👇
|
- The JC’s famous Nutshell™ summary of this clause