Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 3: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Replaced content with "{{isda 3 summ|isdaprov}}"
Tag: Replaced
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
If you want any special extra {{isdaprov|Representations}} over and above the boring ones in Section {{isdaprov|3}}, stick them in {{isdaprov|Part 5}} of the {{isdaprov|Schedule}}, or maybe a [[master confirmation]], be sure to label them “{{isdaprov|Additional Representation}}s” and, if the fancy catches you, have the representor [[deem]] them repeated on the commencement of any new {{isdaprov|Transaction}}, the anniversary of the {{isdama}} or whenever, in a moment of weakness, insecurity or indolence, your operations team feels like [[reaching out]] to the counterparty and asking it to say them again. They’ll love you for it.
{{isda 3 summ|isdaprov}}
==={{isdaprov|Misrepresentation}} is an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}===
A breach of any of these {{isdaprov|Representations}} when made (or [[deemed]] repeated) (except a [[Payer Tax Representation - ISDA Provision|Payer]] or {{isdaprov|Payee Tax Representation}}, but including any {{isdaprov|Additional Representation}}  is an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}.
 
{{Additional Representations as Termination Events|isdaprov}}

Latest revision as of 11:46, 24 December 2023

If you want any special extra Representations over and above the boring ones in Section 3, stick them in Part 5 of the Schedule, or maybe a master confirmation, be sure to label them “Additional Representations” and, if the fancy catches you, have the representor deem them repeated on the commencement of any new Transaction, the anniversary of the ISDA Master Agreement or whenever, in a moment of weakness, insecurity or indolence, your operations team feels like reaching out to the counterparty and asking it to say them again. They’ll love you for it.

Yes, Misrepresentation is an Event of Default

A breach of any of these Representations when made (or deemed repeated) (except a Payer or Payee Tax Representation, but including any Additional Representation is an Event of Default. Eventually.

Additional Representations as Additional Termination Events

In the case of Additional Representations this can be somewhat drastic, especially if your Additional Representation is Transaction-specific (for example India, China and Taiwan investor status reps for equity derivatives), and it would seem churlish to close out a whole ISDA Master Agreement on their account.

Then again, show me a swap dealer who would detonate an entire swap trading relationship with a solvent counterparty and I’ll show you a moron — but, as we know, opposing legal eagles operate on the presumption that everyone else is a moron and thus tend to be immune to such grand rhetorical flourishes, and regard such appeals to basic common sense as precisely such flourishes, so don’t expect that argument to carry the day, however practically true it may be.

Instead, expect to encounter leagues of agonising drafting, but there are easier roads to travel. Try:

These representations will be Additional Representations, except that where they prove to be materially incorrect or misleading when made or repeated it will not be an Event of Default but an Additional Termination Event, where the Transactions in question are the Affected Transactions and the misrepresenting party is the sole Affected Party.