Template:M comp disc IETA 5.3: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "What a shower. There will seldom come a time where a nutshell version of a clause would come in more handy, readers. If only you subscribed to the premium version of the JC you would have one. It is partly a case of shambolic conceptual organisation, partly ropey drafting, but this clause makes a n omnishambles of a fairly straightforward concept."
 
Replaced content with "{{Emissions no encumbrances|ietaprov}}"
Tag: Replaced
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[No Encumbrances - IETA Provision|What]] a shower. There will seldom come a time where a nutshell version of a clause would come in more handy, readers. If only you subscribed to the premium version of the JC you would [[pjc:No Encumbrances - IETA Provision|have one]]. It is partly a case of shambolic conceptual organisation, partly ropey drafting, but this clause makes a n omnishambles of a fairly straightforward concept.
{{Emissions no encumbrances|ietaprov}}

Latest revision as of 13:46, 31 July 2023

The absence of encumbrances — which was a matter of concern, in the early days of the emissions trading world, while birth pangs nascent fraud still ricocheted and lapped across the carbon soup of the primordial EU Emissions Trading Scheme — is covered fulsomely, consistently — if not a little defensively — in all the emissions master trading documents.

See:

Here is a comparison of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, comparison IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the comparison of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you.

We also have a special section about Unauthorised Transfers (being ISDA Section (d)(vii)(4), IETA Clause 5.4(d) and EFET Clause 6.3(d)) which goes into all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that goes with breaches of the No Encumbrances Obligation brought about specifically by theft.