Or: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
It follows, therefore, that an or statement may be true even if ''both'' the operands have a value of one, and you don’t need that outrageous desecration of the English language, “[[and/or]]”.
It follows, therefore, that an or statement may be true even if ''both'' the operands have a value of one, and you don’t need that outrageous desecration of the English language, “[[and/or]]”.


===See also===
Your “[[or ratio]]” indicates the clarity and confidence of your writing.
{{sa}}
*[[Or ratio]]
*[[And]]
*[[And]]
*[[And/or]]
*[[And/or]]
*[[Virgule]]
*[[Virgule]]
{{c3|Conjunction|Egg|ISIA}}
{{c3|Conjunction|Egg|ISIA}}

Latest revision as of 14:13, 13 August 2024

Towards more picturesque speech
SEC guidance on plain EnglishIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Or” is a logical operation which gives the value one if at least one operand has the value one, and otherwise gives a value of zero.

It follows, therefore, that an or statement may be true even if both the operands have a value of one, and you don’t need that outrageous desecration of the English language, “and/or”.

Your “or ratio” indicates the clarity and confidence of your writing.

See also