UCITS V: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{anat|ucits}} | {{anat|ucits}} | ||
[[UCITS V]] is the latest installment of the [[UCITS]] saga — which is to European legislation what the appendices to the Lord of the Rings are to fantasy literature. It can be found at {{eudirective|2014|91|EU}}. It augments and amends [[UCITS IV]], much of which is still in force. [[UCITS IV]] has specific implications for [[Depositaries]] and their {{tag|sub-custodian}}s (known in the legislation as "delegates"). Much of this was prompted by [[Madoff]]<ref>I derive some perverse enjoyment from the fact that [[Madoff]] is a broken link on this site. Click on it and there’s nothing there.</ref>. | |||
Here's from an official EU [http://ec.europa.eu/finance/investment/docs/ucits-directive/20120703-citizens-summary_en.pdf idiot's guide] to the legislation: | Here's from an official EU [http://ec.europa.eu/finance/investment/docs/ucits-directive/20120703-citizens-summary_en.pdf idiot's guide] to the legislation: | ||
===The Problem=== | ===The Problem=== | ||
There were 3 problems with existing | There were 3 problems with existing [[UCITS]] legislation: | ||
*Legal protection for UCITS investors varies too much among countries. | *Legal protection for UCITS investors varies too much among countries. | ||
**UCITS assets are held by a depositary which also checks the fund manager's activities (e.g. compliance with investment strategy). There were only vague requirements on the depositary and its liability towards investors when things go wrong. These requirements were interpreted differently across Europe, so investors don't always have the same standards of protection. | **UCITS assets are held by a depositary which also checks the fund manager's activities (e.g. compliance with investment strategy). There were only vague requirements on the depositary and its liability towards investors when things go wrong. These requirements were interpreted differently across Europe, so investors don't always have the same standards of protection. | ||
**Different countries tended to take different approaches to penalising fund managers or | **Different countries tended to take different approaches to penalising fund managers or [[depositaries]]. | ||
*It had not kept up with the complexity of investment techniques and instruments. | *It had not kept up with the complexity of investment techniques and instruments. | ||
*It allowed inappropriate pay policies for fund managers, which lead to excessive risk-taking. | *It allowed inappropriate pay policies for fund managers, which lead to excessive risk-taking. | ||
===The solution === | ===The solution === | ||
Detailed, comprehensive rules on | Detailed, comprehensive rules on [[depositaries]]' tasks that would establish: | ||
*Which assets the depositary must hold directly, what it must do with them and what it should do for assets that can't be held this way. | *Which assets the depositary must hold directly, what it must do with them and what it should do for assets that can't be held this way. | ||
*how and when | *how and when [[depositaries]] can delegate activities to {{tag|sub-custodian}}s, and their residual liability where they have done so; | ||
* | *[[Depositary]]'s obligations assets held by the depositary are lost: the depositary must replace them as soon as possible with assets of the same type or value (unless this is due to an external event beyond its control). | ||
*Comprehensive rules on pay policies. | *Comprehensive rules on pay policies. | ||
*minimum penalties across europe to be used when | *minimum penalties across europe to be used when [[UCITS]], their managers or depositaries breach key requirements. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
* | *[[UCITS]] | ||
*[[Sub-custodian]] | *[[Sub-custodian]] | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024
|
UCITS Anatomy™
{{{2}}}
|
UCITS V is the latest installment of the UCITS saga — which is to European legislation what the appendices to the Lord of the Rings are to fantasy literature. It can be found at 2014/91/EU (EUR Lex). It augments and amends UCITS IV, much of which is still in force. UCITS IV has specific implications for Depositaries and their sub-custodians (known in the legislation as "delegates"). Much of this was prompted by Madoff[1].
Here's from an official EU idiot's guide to the legislation:
The Problem
There were 3 problems with existing UCITS legislation:
- Legal protection for UCITS investors varies too much among countries.
- UCITS assets are held by a depositary which also checks the fund manager's activities (e.g. compliance with investment strategy). There were only vague requirements on the depositary and its liability towards investors when things go wrong. These requirements were interpreted differently across Europe, so investors don't always have the same standards of protection.
- Different countries tended to take different approaches to penalising fund managers or depositaries.
- It had not kept up with the complexity of investment techniques and instruments.
- It allowed inappropriate pay policies for fund managers, which lead to excessive risk-taking.
The solution
Detailed, comprehensive rules on depositaries' tasks that would establish:
- Which assets the depositary must hold directly, what it must do with them and what it should do for assets that can't be held this way.
- how and when depositaries can delegate activities to sub-custodians, and their residual liability where they have done so;
- Depositary's obligations assets held by the depositary are lost: the depositary must replace them as soon as possible with assets of the same type or value (unless this is due to an external event beyond its control).
- Comprehensive rules on pay policies.
- minimum penalties across europe to be used when UCITS, their managers or depositaries breach key requirements.