Notice (of Termination Event) - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "{{isdaanatomy}}" to "{{anat|isda}}" |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Note the difficulty of practical compliance with this provision, given a sizeable ISDA portfolio, and the requirement for actively monitoring not only standard {{isdaprov|Termination Events}}, but also {{isdaprov|Additional Termination Events}}, which may be counterparty or even {{isdaprov|Transaction}}-specific. | Note the difficulty of practical compliance with this provision, given a sizeable ISDA portfolio, and the requirement for actively monitoring not only standard {{isdaprov|Termination Events}}, but also {{isdaprov|Additional Termination Events}}, which may be counterparty or even {{isdaprov|Transaction}}-specific. | ||
Be aware of the {{isdaprov|notices}} provision of the ISDA, especially if you're using a {{1992ma}} - [[Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc - case note|NatWest Bank]] could tell you a thing or two about that. | |||
{{anat|isda}} | {{anat|isda}} |
Revision as of 14:41, 19 August 2016
Section 6(b) of the 1992 ISDA
In gory detail
|
|
Analysis
Note the difficulty of practical compliance with this provision, given a sizeable ISDA portfolio, and the requirement for actively monitoring not only standard Termination Events, but also Additional Termination Events, which may be counterparty or even Transaction-specific.
Be aware of the notices provision of the ISDA, especially if you're using a 1992 ISDA - NatWest Bank could tell you a thing or two about that.