Non-Hedging Party - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "{{eqderivanatomy}}" to "{{anat|eqderiv}}" |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{eqderivsnap|12.9(xii)}} | {{eqderivsnap|12.9(a)(xii)}} | ||
====Commentary==== | ====Commentary==== | ||
Note hugely controversial, you wuold think, but it does sort of imply that the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} is itself a party to the transaction - otherwise ''both'' parties are {{eqderivprov|Non-Hedging Parties}}. But if so, then there's not really any need for the definition of {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} at all ... | Note hugely controversial, you wuold think, but it does sort of imply that the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} is itself a party to the transaction - otherwise ''both'' parties are {{eqderivprov|Non-Hedging Parties}}. But if so, then there's not really any need for the definition of {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} at all ... | ||
Revision as of 17:04, 17 May 2022
Commentary
Note hugely controversial, you wuold think, but it does sort of imply that the Hedging Party is itself a party to the transaction - otherwise both parties are Non-Hedging Parties. But if so, then there's not really any need for the definition of Hedging Party at all ...
Related Provisions
|
Equity Derivatives Anatomy™
{{{2}}}
|