Legal opinion: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{Box|''({{f|Subject always}} to the qualifications, assumptions and caveats set out on pages 4-85)<ref>''And Schedule 3, and the four appendices to our letter of engagement for that matter.</ref>,'' this agreement is enforceable [[in accordance with]] its terms.}} | {{Box|''({{f|Subject always}} to the qualifications, assumptions and caveats set out on pages 4-85)<ref>''And Schedule 3, and the four appendices to our letter of engagement for that matter.</ref>,'' this agreement is enforceable [[in accordance with]] its terms.}} | ||
Which is a [[mediocre lawyer|lawyer’]]s way of saying “[[Brexit means Brexit]]”. Should the agreement your solicitor has prepared for you make no sense whatsoever; if it is plainly impossible for an ordinary Englishman to divine the merchants’ commercial consensus no matter how carefully he examines the text — hardly an inconceivable contingency — then your expensively wrangled opinion does no more than verify that sorry state of affairs. | Which is a [[mediocre lawyer|lawyer’]]s way of saying “[[Brexit means Brexit]]”. Should the agreement your solicitor has prepared for you make no sense whatsoever; if it is plainly impossible for an ordinary Englishman to divine the merchants’ commercial consensus no matter how carefully he examines the text — hardly an inconceivable contingency when that agreement was drawn up by a [[mediocre lawyer|lawyer]] — then your expensively wrangled opinion does no more than verify that sorry state of affairs. | ||
{{Ref}} | {{Ref}} | ||
Revision as of 19:36, 19 January 2017
A document designed to achieve exactly the opposite effect to the one its reader anticipates, in that it carries as little by way of meaningful existential content as possible, while being as comprehensive, categorical and absolute as it can be about what it is not saying. Which is, more or less, everything.
This is typical of the sum total of the positive statement of the law you find in a legal opinion:
- (Subject always to the qualifications, assumptions and caveats set out on pages 4-85)[1], this agreement is enforceable in accordance with its terms.
Which is a lawyer’s way of saying “Brexit means Brexit”. Should the agreement your solicitor has prepared for you make no sense whatsoever; if it is plainly impossible for an ordinary Englishman to divine the merchants’ commercial consensus no matter how carefully he examines the text — hardly an inconceivable contingency when that agreement was drawn up by a lawyer — then your expensively wrangled opinion does no more than verify that sorry state of affairs.
References
- ↑ And Schedule 3, and the four appendices to our letter of engagement for that matter.