Equitable indemnity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not a thing. | Not a thing. | ||
''Except in California''<ref>[http://vondranlegal.com/what-is-definition-of-equitable-idemnity/ Client briefing on the fabulous Californian legal concept of the [[equitable indemnity]]]</ref>. | ''Except in California''<ref>[http://vondranlegal.com/what-is-definition-of-equitable-idemnity/ Client briefing on the fabulous Californian legal concept of the [[equitable indemnity]]]</ref>. Which reminds me: | ||
Which reminds me: | |||
:''Q: How many Californians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?'' | :''Q: How many Californians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?'' | ||
:''A: None. Californians screw in spa-pools.'' | :''A: None. Californians screw in spa-pools.'' | ||
{{hawf}} | {{hawf}} | ||
Anyway, since it isn’t a thing, its non-existence can be definitively established by deft use of a suitable [[disclaimer]]. | |||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} |
Revision as of 15:35, 24 March 2017
Not a thing.
Except in California[1]. Which reminds me:
- Q: How many Californians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
- A: None. Californians screw in spa-pools.
This gag comes to you direct from our “here all week, folks!” store of corking one-liners.
Anyway, since it isn’t a thing, its non-existence can be definitively established by deft use of a suitable disclaimer.