Consequences of Hedging Disruption - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fullanat|eqderiv|12.9(b)(iii)|}} | {{fullanat|eqderiv|12.9(b)(iii)|}} | ||
You may see a rider to this clause along the following lines: | |||
:“Where reasonably practical, the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} must elect to terminate only the part of the {{isdaprov|Transaction}} with the {{eqderivprov|Number of Shares}} corresponding to the {{eqderivprov|Hedge Position}} that the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}} relates to, and the {{eqderivprov|Cancellation Amount}} is then determined over only the terminated part of the {{eqderivprov|Transaction}}”. | |||
{{Seealso}} | |||
*{{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Events}} and | *{{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Events}} and | ||
*{{eqderivprov|Consenquences of an Additional Disuption Event}}, and | *{{eqderivprov|Consenquences of an Additional Disuption Event}}, and | ||
*{{eqderivprov|triple cocktail}}. | *{{eqderivprov|triple cocktail}}. |
Revision as of 16:32, 6 April 2017
You may see a rider to this clause along the following lines:
- “Where reasonably practical, the Hedging Party must elect to terminate only the part of the Transaction with the Number of Shares corresponding to the Hedge Position that the Hedging Disruption relates to, and the Cancellation Amount is then determined over only the terminated part of the Transaction”.