Nominalisation: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{tag| | {{tag|Nominalisation}} is, itself, a nominalisation of the verb to "nominalise". Goedel would be pleased. | ||
{{plain|issue a notification to|tell}} | {{plain|issue a notification to|tell}} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Dead give aways: | Dead give aways: | ||
*the string “''ion of''” | *the string “''[[ion of]]''” | ||
*[[gerund]]s | *[[gerund]]s | ||
*[[infinitive]]s | *[[infinitive]]s | ||
Revision as of 15:07, 30 August 2017
Nominalisation is, itself, a nominalisation of the verb to "nominalise". Goedel would be pleased.
Why say “issue a notification to” when you mean “tell”?
Why say “have a discussion about” when you mean “discuss”?
Why say “we are supportive of” when you mean “we support”?
Why say “have the appearance of being” when you mean “appear to be”?
Nominalisation is the act, as adored by solicitors as it is loathed by anyone who cares for the English language, of gutting a precise verb, by converting it into a noun and jamming a general verb in front of it.
Or should I say:
- Nominalisation is the act, which induces adoration in solicitors as much as it effects a sensation of loathing in anyone having a fondness for the English language, of ensuring the evisceration of a precise verb by effecting its conversion into a noun (or adjective) and ensuring the jammery of a general verb in front of it.
Dead give aways:
- the string “ion of”
- gerunds
- infinitives
Effecting a nominalisation: grammatical cross-dressing
The worst kind of nominalisation goes a step further: not only must the poor verb dress up as a noun; an equally unsuspecting noun must behave like a verb. “Effect” is this kind of nominalisation.