Merger Without Assumption - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fullanat2|isda|5(a)(viii)|2002|5(a)(viii)|1992}} | {{fullanat2|isda|5(a)(viii)|2002|5(a)(viii)|1992}} | ||
{{nuts|2002 ISDA|5(a)(viii)}} | {{nuts|2002 ISDA|5(a)(viii)}} | ||
This can be triggered if: | |||
*The resulting party repudiates any existing Transactions under the ISDA; or | |||
*(in the case of a transfer of assets) a small rump of Transactions are left in the original entity, and not transferred at all. | |||
===And [[all or substantially all]] means?=== | |||
There's not a lot of case law on it. Some say 90%. Some say 70%. |
Revision as of 17:17, 19 March 2018
ISDA Anatomy™
|
5(a)(viii) in a Nutshell™ (2002 ISDA edition)
- 5(a)(viii) Merger Without Assumption. The party (or a Credit Support Provider) merges with or transfers or all or substantially all its assets to another entity and:―
- (1) the resulting entity does not assume all the original party’s obligations under this Agreement (or Credit Support Document); or
- (2) the Credit Support Document does cover the resulting party’s obligations under this Agreement.
This can be triggered if:
- The resulting party repudiates any existing Transactions under the ISDA; or
- (in the case of a transfer of assets) a small rump of Transactions are left in the original entity, and not transferred at all.
And all or substantially all means?
There's not a lot of case law on it. Some say 90%. Some say 70%.