Luxembourg law pledge: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Amwelladmin moved page Luxembourg pledge to Luxembourg law pledge
Line 18: Line 18:
:'''The 2001 Law''', being the law dated 1 August 2001 regarding the transfer of securities and other fungible instruments, [[As amended from time to time|as amended]].
:'''The 2001 Law''', being the law dated 1 August 2001 regarding the transfer of securities and other fungible instruments, [[As amended from time to time|as amended]].
:''' The Financial Collateral Law''', being the Luxembourg law of 5 August 2005 on financial collateral arrangements, [[As amended from time to time|as amended]].
:''' The Financial Collateral Law''', being the Luxembourg law of 5 August 2005 on financial collateral arrangements, [[As amended from time to time|as amended]].
:'''Financial Instruments''', being  financial instruments (''instruments financiers<ref>It is a common feature of foreign law pledges to sprinkle elaborate foreign lingo around the document in italics as if they are some kinds of {{t|magic words}}.</ref>'') in the widest sense of the word admitted under Luxembourg law, though you can expect the defintion to rabbit on a bit: you know, [[whether or not]] in dematerialised form, printed on urine-soaked vellum, gossamer, kleenex etc.
:'''The Pledged Assets''': What are you actually granting security over? This is the stuff in an account in Luxembourg. Expect it to include:
**'''Financial Instruments''' being  financial instruments (''instruments financiers''”<ref>It is a common feature of foreign law pledges to sprinkle elaborate foreign lingo around the document in italics as if they are some kinds of {{t|magic words}}.</ref>) in the widest sense of the word admitted under Luxembourg law, though you can expect the defintion to rabbit on a bit: you know, [[whether or not]] in dematerialised form, printed on urine-soaked vellum, gossamer, kleenex etc.
**'''Related Assets''', meaning dividends, interest, proceeds — again, expect your counsel to go to town here.
:'''Secured Obligations''': What does the pledge actually secure?
====The Pledge===
A fairly simple statement, admittedly studded with a little bit of ''Français'', about what's going on:
:''The [[Pledgor]] pledges the Pledged Assets in favour of the [[Pledgee]], who accepts, as first-priority pledge (''gage de premier rang'') for the due and punctual discharge in full of all of the Secured Obligations.
====The Acknowledgement====
The Custodian will need to acknowledge that it has notice of the [[pledge]]. This will [[perfect]] the [[security]], and is a key part of the deep magic of security interests. A similar requirement exists in most jurisdictions.
 
And that's it: rather like going to a christening. the main event is now over, and you now have to sit in the church for three quarters of an hour croaking hymns, listening to the choir warble through some psalms, the vicar grumble through the same tedious sermon he’s been doling out for thirty years etc. So strap yourselves in.
 


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}

Revision as of 16:47, 31 October 2018

A word about credit risk mitigation

{{{2}}}

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


A pledge — that is, a form of security interest — governed by Luxembourg law.

Especially useful if your lex situs happens to be Luxembourg, which has always been relatively common, and is more so now the United Kingdom has sentenced its own financial services industry to a lingering and painful death by existing the European Union, likely to become ever more common.

Not having a developed law of equity[1], Luxembourg law doesn’t faff around with concepts like fixed or floating charges, making its security analysis a lot less tedious: there is none of this doleful “is it a fixed charge or a floating charge, oh woe is me! What would Re Spectrum Plus or the extended liens decision have to say about that?”

When do you need a Lux pledge?

When the assets you are taking security over are situated in Luxembourg. See: lex situs.

What’s in it

Luxembourg law pledges are boring documents. I mean no slight on Luxembourg, or Luxembourg law, when I say that. Luxembourg is a nice place and it has excellent laws. Lux pledges should be boring. They fulfill an important, but nonetheless mechanical role: they make sure your security arrangement works as a matter of Luxembourg law, since that’s where the assets are, and you’ll be at the mercy of the Luxembourgoisie should you want to enforce it.

It’s a simple process and there's little magic in it, but this won’t stop custodians developing 17-page templates. Just to be sure, you understand.

Definitions

Of course there will be definitions. what self-respecting legal document will be without them? Expect to see, in particular, reference to:

The 2001 Law, being the law dated 1 August 2001 regarding the transfer of securities and other fungible instruments, as amended.
The Financial Collateral Law, being the Luxembourg law of 5 August 2005 on financial collateral arrangements, as amended.
The Pledged Assets: What are you actually granting security over? This is the stuff in an account in Luxembourg. Expect it to include:
    • Financial Instruments being financial instruments (“instruments financiers[2]) in the widest sense of the word admitted under Luxembourg law, though you can expect the defintion to rabbit on a bit: you know, whether or not in dematerialised form, printed on urine-soaked vellum, gossamer, kleenex etc.
    • Related Assets, meaning dividends, interest, proceeds — again, expect your counsel to go to town here.
Secured Obligations: What does the pledge actually secure?

=The Pledge

A fairly simple statement, admittedly studded with a little bit of Français, about what's going on:

The Pledgor pledges the Pledged Assets in favour of the Pledgee, who accepts, as first-priority pledge (gage de premier rang) for the due and punctual discharge in full of all of the Secured Obligations.

The Acknowledgement

The Custodian will need to acknowledge that it has notice of the pledge. This will perfect the security, and is a key part of the deep magic of security interests. A similar requirement exists in most jurisdictions.

And that's it: rather like going to a christening. the main event is now over, and you now have to sit in the church for three quarters of an hour croaking hymns, listening to the choir warble through some psalms, the vicar grumble through the same tedious sermon he’s been doling out for thirty years etc. So strap yourselves in.


See also

References

  1. The fiduciary concept notwithstanding, which sounds EXACTLY like a product of the law of equity.
  2. It is a common feature of foreign law pledges to sprinkle elaborate foreign lingo around the document in italics as if they are some kinds of magic words.