Lex situs: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
So, if your assets are held in a [[tri-party collateral arrangement]] in {{tag|Luxembourg}}, for example, even if your trading contract is an English law {{gmsla}}, you ought to have a [[Luxembourg law pledge]] to go with your English law [[Fixed charge|fixed]] or [[floating charge]]. | So, if your assets are held in a [[tri-party collateral arrangement]] in {{tag|Luxembourg}}, for example, even if your trading contract is an English law {{gmsla}}, you ought to have a [[Luxembourg law pledge]] to go with your English law [[Fixed charge|fixed]] or [[floating charge]]. | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Luxembourg law pledge]] | *[[Luxembourg law pledge]] | ||
*[[Pledge]] | *[[Pledge]] | ||
Revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020
|
A word about credit risk mitigation
{{{2}}}
|
Latin for “the law of the place”. Relevant when contemplating the deep magic of taking security over assets in far-off places.
In a nutshell, international conventions of security law say that it is best to have security interests governed by the “lex situs” – the prevailing domestic law where the secured assets are physically located.
So, if your assets are held in a tri-party collateral arrangement in Luxembourg, for example, even if your trading contract is an English law 2010 GMSLA, you ought to have a Luxembourg law pledge to go with your English law fixed or floating charge.