Service catalog: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A [[service catalog]], per someone’s lovingly curated original research on Wikipedia, is
{{g}}A [[service catalog]], per someone’s lovingly curated original research on Wikipedia, is
:“..a means of centralizing all services that are important to the [[stakeholder|stakeholders]] of the enterprises which implement and use it. Given its digital and virtual implementation, via software, the service catalog acts, at a minimum, as a digital registry and a means for highly distributed enterprises to see, find, invoke, and execute services regardless of where they exist in the world. This means that people in one part of the world can find and utilize the same services that people in other parts of the world use, eliminating the need to develop and support local services via a federated implementation model.
:“..a means of centralizing all services that are important to the [[stakeholder|stakeholders]] of the enterprises which implement and use it. Given its digital and virtual implementation, via software, the [[service catalog]] acts, at a minimum, as a digital registry and a means for highly distributed enterprises to see, find, invoke, and execute services regardless of where they exist in the world. This means that people in one part of the world can find and utilize the same services that people in other parts of the world use, eliminating the need to develop and support local services via a federated implementation model.


:“''Centralizing services also acts as a means of identifying service gaps and redundancies that can then be addressed by the enterprise to improve itself<ref>In other words, firing people.</ref>”
:“''Centralizing services also acts as a means of identifying service gaps and redundancies that can then be addressed by the enterprise to improve itself<ref>In other words, firing people.</ref>”
Line 6: Line 6:
The point at which a [[service catalog]] becomes irresistible is the [[tipping point]] where your organisation has so large and sprawling that the potential economies of scale outweigh the costs of disenfranchising all your local [[subject matter expert]]s by jamming them into a universal model that won’t ''quite'' fit ''any'' of their local day to day experiences, and depriving them of the autonomy to use their subject matter expertise to make pragmatic decisions on the hoof to keep the organisation moving.
The point at which a [[service catalog]] becomes irresistible is the [[tipping point]] where your organisation has so large and sprawling that the potential economies of scale outweigh the costs of disenfranchising all your local [[subject matter expert]]s by jamming them into a universal model that won’t ''quite'' fit ''any'' of their local day to day experiences, and depriving them of the autonomy to use their subject matter expertise to make pragmatic decisions on the hoof to keep the organisation moving.


This is part of a wider thrust to [[operationalise]] the organisation. You, dear [[subject matter expert]], cannot fight it because ''you are the redundancy the thrust is designed to eradicate''.
This is part of a wider thrust to [[operationalise]] the organisation. You, dear [[subject matter expert]], cannot fight it, because ''you are the redundancy the thrust is designed to eradicate''.
{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Playbook]]
*[[Playbook]]

Revision as of 10:07, 18 July 2019

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A service catalog, per someone’s lovingly curated original research on Wikipedia, is

“..a means of centralizing all services that are important to the stakeholders of the enterprises which implement and use it. Given its digital and virtual implementation, via software, the service catalog acts, at a minimum, as a digital registry and a means for highly distributed enterprises to see, find, invoke, and execute services regardless of where they exist in the world. This means that people in one part of the world can find and utilize the same services that people in other parts of the world use, eliminating the need to develop and support local services via a federated implementation model.
Centralizing services also acts as a means of identifying service gaps and redundancies that can then be addressed by the enterprise to improve itself[1]

The point at which a service catalog becomes irresistible is the tipping point where your organisation has so large and sprawling that the potential economies of scale outweigh the costs of disenfranchising all your local subject matter experts by jamming them into a universal model that won’t quite fit any of their local day to day experiences, and depriving them of the autonomy to use their subject matter expertise to make pragmatic decisions on the hoof to keep the organisation moving.

This is part of a wider thrust to operationalise the organisation. You, dear subject matter expert, cannot fight it, because you are the redundancy the thrust is designed to eradicate.

See also

References

  1. In other words, firing people.